introduction
e two foundations of modern scholarship for the history of Archaic
to Roman essaly are O. Kern’s Inscriptiones essaliae (IG .)
and F. Stählin’s Das hellenische essalien.
3
Kern’s corpus, which
furnishes the epigraphic basis for all research on the region, made a
systematic analysis of essalian social and political institutions pos-
sible.
4
Stählin, a practitioner of the traditional art of historical geog-
raphy, put essalian topography on a relatively rm basis. Although
not all of the readings of the former or the identications of the latter
have been universally endorsed by later generations of scholars, their
work continues to be the source of much productive disagreement. e
early generations of archaeologists working in essaly deserve mention
here as well, especially A.S. Arvanitopoulos and N.I. Giannopoulos. Both
scholars excavated tirelessly and published prolically, and both made
important contributions to the study of essalian epigraphy, topog-
raphy, and history.
5
e inuence of two contemporary giants in the
study of ancient essaly (and much else besides) is felt throughout the
present volume: Christian Habicht and Bruno Helly. Both can be seen
to continue the work of Kern and Stählin. Habicht has tended to focus
on the politics of the Hellenistic period,
6
while Helly and the équipe
thessalienne based at the Institut Fernand Courby, Lyon, have taken a
Larisa, an arrangement which continues to produce misunderstandings in scholarship,
e.g., Miller , p. : ‘ese games [the Eleutheria] were apparently not open to
other Greeks; only citizens of Larisa participated. An inscription from about the time
of Christ lists the events and the names of their winners (IG ., ). Many of these are
standard competitions of the gymnikos agon: stadion and diaulos races, the pyx, and
the pankration, for both men and boys. ere were also competitions for trumpeters
and heralds. Competitions in literary composition and rhetoric were held, but none in
music—a signicant dierence with the Panathenaia: a torch race for boys, the apobates,
and cavalry marksmanship, as well as a cavalry charge, an infantry charge, and infantry
marksmanship and archery … It is curious that the Eleutheria did not seem to have any
of the standard horse races’. Nearly every claim in this passage is incorrect. It is hoped that
the arrangement of these inscriptions oered in the present volume will help to provide
amoresecurebasisforfuturestudyofthefestival.
3
Major advances in the study of essalian history must also be ascribed to Kern and
Stählin’s predecessors, especially H.G. Lolling, who conducted important topographic
and epigraphic research in the region. See Habicht a and Habicht b. For a
conspectus of early travelers to essaly, see IG ., pp. xxvi–xxviii.
4
To be supplemented with McDevitt , SEG,andBullÉp.
5
For a conspectus of their research, see Gallis .
6
One of Habicht’s students, H. Kramolisch, is the author of several important studies
of Hellenistic essaly, including the fundamental Die Strategen des thessalischen
Bundes vom Jahr v. Chr. bis zum Ausgang der römischen Republik.