American Philosophical Society. 2002. 286 p.
BOOK was first conceived, and some portions written, for the
students in the class of history of chemistry that I was teaching
during the I980s following the retirement of Aaron J. Ihde at the
University of Wisconsin. My aim in teaching these chemistry and
pre-med senior students was to enlarge their understanding of the
nature of chemical science and explain how the concepts they were
leaing in their chemistry classes came to be. It is both to those
students and to Aaron Ihde that I owe the inspir-ation for this
attempt to present a simple, readable account of how in the
eighteenth century chemical composition slowly abandoned the
centuries-long tradition of metaphysical elements of EARTH, AIR,
FIRE, and WATER, or the Paracelsanv ariation of MERCURY,SU LPHUR,
and SALT.B y the end of the eighteenth century, chemical
composition had become expressible in terms of operationally
defined material simple bodies made verbally explicit by
Lavoisier's successful new chemistry, wherein the elements were
defined as any body not yet shown to be compound. Just twenty years
af-ter Lavoisier, John Dalton introduced the concept of atomic
weight unique to each simple body, from which came the mode
quantitative structure of chemical composition. Hence the story of
the movement of chemical theory from metaphysical ELEMENTS to
operationally-functional ATOMS.
Contents
The Seventeenth Century: Chemistry Comes of Age
Robert Boyle: The Sceptical Chymist
The Stagnation of Chemical Theory: 1675-I750
The Development of the Idea of Neutral Salt
An Historiographic Digression: Phlogiston
How Air Retued to Chemistry: A Brief History of Air 1600-1750
The Retu of the Four Elements
French Chemistry circa I760
The Marriage of Air and Phlogiston
Lavoisier and the Anti-Phlogistic Doctrine
A Compositional Nomenclature
A Comparative View of the Phlogistic and Anti-Phlogistic
Philosophies
Assimilation and Anticipation
John Dalton and the Chemical Atomic Theory