Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 2008, 194 p.
Contents
List of Figures and Tables
Series Foreword
Preface
Acknowledgments
Author
Contributors
1 Introduction: Assessing Nanotechnology Health and Environmental
Risks
2 Defining Risk Assessment and How It Is Used for Environmental
Protection, and Its Potential Role for Managing Nanotechnology
Risks
3 Sustainable Nanotechnology Development Using Risk Assessment and
Applying Life Cycle Thinking
4 The State of the Science — Human Health, Toxicology, and
Nanotechnological Risk
5 The State of the Science — Environmental Risks
6 NANO LCRA — An Adaptive Screening-Level Life Cycle
Risk Assessment Framework for Nanotechnology
7 Alteative Approaches for Life Cycle Risk Assessment for
Nanotechnology and Comprehensive Environmental Assessment
Contents
8 Current and Proposed Approaches for Managing Risks in
Occupational Environments
9 Ongoing Inteational Efforts to Address Risk Issues for
Nanotechnology
Index
Preface
Technology is a powerful force of change in our world. We live
longer and arguably better lives than our great-great-grandparents
because of advances in medical, communication, and transportation
technology. As we enter this new century there is apparently no end
in sight for the transformative potential of human innovation.
However, there is now ample evidence that the real legacy of
invention is defined in equal parts by its benefits to society as
well as its costs. There is no technology that comes without some
level of risk. What this can or should mean for the process of
creating and nurturing emerging technology remains a central
question for all of society, one which this book explores for the
emerging area of nanotechnology.
The term ‘nanotechnology’ encompasses a dizzying array of
individual technologies, integrated into products in virtually
every industry we can define. Nanotechnology can be found in humble
products like antibacterial fabrics, as well as in the memory and
computing elements of the latest highend computers. What links
these very different applications is their reliance on materials
that are designed and shaped with nanometer scale precision. These
systems can possess very special chemical, optical, and magnetic
properties that motivate their use; their size—from one to one
hundred nanometers—can also be a great advantage for engineering
design. Some nanoparticles, for example, can mix with and penetrate
both solid and liquid
media normally impermeable to larger size particulates. The small
size, chemical reactivity, and tunable properties together drive
their use across a wide swath of products.
These same features, when considered through the lens of risk
assessment, drive a different set of conces about nanomaterial
safety. Some unbound nanoparticles are often engineered for
persistence, high chemical reactivity, and can be found in a wide
set of products and thus a wide set of exposure conditions. It is
reasonable, but not yet proven, that given the sheer number of
nanoparticle types and possible exposures there exists some
potential for
unwanted environmental impacts. The technical data that could prove
or disprove this hypothesis are still incomplete, and the best
practices for generating such information are just now being
clarified. Regulatory policy is still evolving but the early signs
in several countries indicate a watchful, but not overly cautious
stance. It is in this climate of uncertainty and optimism that
nanotechnology is taking its first steps into commercial
products.
Whether these steps lead to a sustainable and secure industry
depends in large part on how well all stakeholders participate in
defining and managing nanotechnology’s risks. Researchers,
policymakers, industry leaders, and consumers must make difficult
decisions about the pace and direction of nanotechnology’s
commercialization. They must discuss, disagree, and eventually
find a common path that navigates between innovation and caution.
Central to this decision making process is risk assessment.
Contributions such as this one provide an updated view of risk
assessment and management practices that accounts for the quirks
and complexities that are unique to products of nanotechnology.
Ultimately, such information can help ensure
that the examination and dialog about nanotechnology’s risks can
occur at the highest possible technical level.