
Paper F1: Accountant in business
408 Go to www.emilewoolfpublishing.com for Q/As, Notes & Study Guides © EWP
There are several ways of measuring the interviewer’s assessment of the employee:
Ranking. When employees are interviewed by the same manager, the manager
can rank them in order of competence. This method of appraisal establishes
which members of the team are better than the others, and this can help with any
decisions that might be taken about promotion. However, this method of
appraisal is also subject to bias, and is only practical when there is a fairly small
number of employees to compare.
Scoring. An organisation may use rating scales to score the competence of an
employee. In a scoring system, each employee may be given a numerical score
(up to a maximum) for each of a number of different competence factors or
performance factors. The overall competence of each employee is then calculated
by adding up the scores for each factor.
Grading. A similar approach to appraisal is to give the employee a grade or
rating on a non-numerical scale – such as excellent, very good, good,
satisfactory, below average and poor.
Critical incident method. Another method of appraisal is to focus on any critical
incident that has occurred during the time since the previous appraisal
interview. The basis of assessment is based on a discussion about how the
employee dealt with the critical incident (well or badly) and whether any lessons
can be learned for the future.
Performance-related assessment. The competence of an employee may be based
on a comparison between the targets or objectives that had been set for the
employee (at the previous appraisal interview) and whether those targets have
been achieved.
7.4 Feedback from the appraisal interview
An important barrier to effective appraisal can be the view of employees that the
annual appraisal is not treated as something important, and that nothing is done
after an appraisal interview has finished.
To prevent this from happening, there must be a system of follow-up and feedback.
There may be agreement between the interviewer and the employee in the
appraisal interview about further training that the employee needs, or ways in
which the employee can be developed. These agreements should be recorded as
part of the official record of the appraisal interview.
The action plan that has been agreed with the employee should be reported to
senior management and the HR department.
The interviewer is normally the manager of the employee. He or she should
follow up the appraisal report and should arrange the training or development
that has been agreed.
At the next appraisal interview, the interviewer and the employee should
discuss whether the agreed training or development was provided, and what
has been its effect. Has the training, job rotation, secondment etc helped with the
employee’s development, and if so in what ways?