presents an opportunity for people to achieve an 'existen.al foothold' in the world (1980, 
5). To him, the contemporary prac.ce of architecture involved Kxing building and dwelling 
in place. He perceived inhabita.on as a layer K"ng over architecture like a glove over a 
hand. Norberg-Schulz implied that architecture and Heideggerian building were 
compa.ble, sugges.ng that an apprecia.on of Heidegger's work could help architects 
make their professional prac.ce more humane and meaningful. Thus he provided a license
which has been li1le ques.oned since, and architectural Heideggerians, broadly, have 
con.nued to relate the philosopher's thinking to professional prac.ce in this way. They 
advocate that architects should be sensi.ve to non-expert building and dwelling, and 
make provision for inhabitants to engage in it. But, although they claim awareness of 
tradi.ons of building and dwelling when designing, this singular ac.vity is assumed to take
place only once a building has been conceived and built according to conven.onal 
procedures. Unlike Heidegger's Black Forest farmhouse residents, who designed and built 
for themselves according to their own needs and cultural expecta.ons, in this scenario the
architect designs, contractors build, and only then do inhabitants build and dwell. 
Zumthor, it seems, approaches Heideggerian architecture in this way.
Another tradition of modern architecture
As described in his account of experience at Vals, Zumthor likes to perceive his 
architecture and its things in associa.on with tradi.ons, be they long standing or more 
recent. He shares this tendency with other Heideggerian architects and writers. The 
philosopher's work - not least in its etymologies, in its roman.cism of rou.nes and rites of 
passage, and in its insistence on authen.city - is imbued with a sense of historicity; a sense
of the passage of .me, of des.ny, and of the past as a reservoir of thinking available to 
contemporary life. Tradi.ons are o+en valorised by architectural Heideggerians following 
the philosopher's thinking; they are promoted as rich, opera.ve histories for the present.
A few authors, notably Colin St John Wilson and Norberg-Schulz, have sought through 
their wri.ngs to assemble a tradi.on of recent architecture from par.cular modern 
architects and projects, with Heidegger's thinking part of their framework. They have 
sought to canonise, to ins.tu.onalise, an
alterna.ve history - or an alterna.ve tradi.on - of modern architecture. Disregarding tensions 
between the philosopher's thinking and expert architectural prac.ce discussed above, both 
authors invoked Heidegger in order to promote to architects what they considered a more 
humane modernism. Wilson began his post-war career designing housing with the London 
120        HEIDEGGER AND ARCHITECTS