87
the successor to La Revue du cinéma (1946–
9), Cahiers du cinéma contributed, with jour-
nals such as Positif and Image et son, to the
rise of film culture in France in the immediate
postwar period. Edited by Jacques Doniol-
Valcroze, J.M.Lo Duca and André Bazin and,
from 1955, by Éric Rohmer, it became cel-
ebrated, retrospectively, as the breeding ground
for the Nouvelle Vague film-makers Truffaut,
Godard, Chabrol and Rivette, as well as
Rohmer himself, all of whom wrote for Cahiers
before making their first films. The journal
became the focus of the politique des auteurs,
adumbrated by Truffaut in the article ‘Une
Certaine Tendance du cinéma français’ (see
February 1954 issue), which defended the role
of the director as ‘author’ of a film and at-
tacked the ‘tradition de qualité’ then dominant
in French cinema. It also enabled the Holly-
wood output of the 1940s and 1950s to be
classified and taken seriously, and established
the reputation of Hollywood directors such as
Hitchcock and Hawks, despised or neglected
up to that time. In this way it defined a new
attitude to both making and viewing films. The
second important, though less well-known as-
pect of Cahiers du cinéma’s influence in the
1950s was the promotion of prewar and post-
war European directors such as Renoir, Gance,
Ophuls, Murnau and Dreyer, and its support
for independent film-makers like Tati and
Melville. Cahiers thus defended cinema as an
important cultural form when it was increas-
ingly threatened by the rise of television, and
bequeathed to British critics in Movie, and
American critics such as Andrew Sarris, the
outlines of the ‘auteur theory’ which was to
dominate film criticism for a generation.
Cahiers du cinéma made a second major
contribution to film theory and practice dur-
ing and after May 1968. It supported Henri
Langlois in his resistance to a Gaullist govern-
ment takeover of the Cinémathèque in 1968,
and it published the proceedings of the États
généraux du cinéma (States General of the
Cinema) held at the time of the May Events.
Under the editorship of Jean-Louis Comolli
and Jean Narboni it became strongly politi-
cized, publishing an important series of arti-
cles on the relationship between fiction and
documentary, and between technology and
ideology, as well as extensive translations of
the writings of Eisenstein. Its Maoist editorial
line caused the withdrawal of financial back-
ing from Daniel Filipacchi and, ultimately, a
sharp decline in circulation, which was
brought to an end, in 1974, by a retour au
cinéma under the joint editorship of Serge
Daney and Narboni. At this point, Cahiers
was redesigned and relaunched for an
upmarket, knowledgeable, but more general,
readership. Today, with a circulation of some
60,000, Cahiers du cinéma remains the most
influential film journal published in France.
JILL FORBES
See also: cinema; documentaries; Gaulle,
Charles de
Further reading
de Baecque, A. (1991) Cahiers du cinéma:
histoire d’une revue, 2 vols, Paris: Cahiers
du Cinéma (essential reading on the life and
times of Cahiers).
Camus, Albert
b. 1913, Mondovi, Algeria;
d. 1960, Villeblevin
Writer, playwright and essayist
Camus’s death in an automobile accident fore-
shortened a career characterized by a remark-
able range of literary and journalistic output.
Not only was Camus the author of important
and widely read novels, the creator and direc-
tor of numerous plays, and a philosophical
essayist/polemicist, but he was deeply engaged
in the events of his time, first as an investiga-
tive journalist in Algeria, then as the editor of
the Resistance journal Combat, and finally as
a regular writer for the first incarnation of the
widely diffused L’Express. Along with
Camus, Albert