Sexuality and Intimacy 255
If one’s personal assessment points to discomfort or lack of knowledge about
sexual orientation variation, many resources are available, including the follow-
ing books: Gay and Gray: The Older Homosexual Man (Berger, 1995), Couple Therapy
with Gay Men (Greenan & Tunnell, 2003), Lesbians over 60 Speak for Themselves
(Kehoe, 1989), and The Lesbian Family Life Cycle (Slater, 1995).
Quam (1993) discussed a variety of sexual and relationship concerns that may
affect older lesbian and gay individuals. For example, many fear that their part-
ners will be turned away by professionals as outsiders rather than being accepted
as spouses, or that their families of choice may not be treated with the same re-
spect as families of origin or families of procreation. Deevy (1990) provided some
excellent suggestions for discussing these clients’ sexuality needs. Asking open-
ended questions such as “Who is most important to you?” rather than “Are you
married, widowed, or divorced?” (p. 37) is one of the many examples offered to
open space for older persons to be themselves if they wish to come out. Gerontol-
ogy professionals can reassure older gay and lesbian individuals who may have
spent a lifetime hiding their sexual orientation from a disapproving society that
they and their relationships are valued and respected. Altman (1999) noted that
homosexually oriented individuals may be isolated and invisible to service
providers, who seem not to realize that gay and lesbian people grow old too.
Ward, Vass, Aggarwal, Garfield, and Cybyk (2005) found that the homosexual
population in care settings is not acknowledged, rendered invisible by heterosex-
ist assumptions, or disapproved of or ridiculed. Yet on a positive note, research
has shown that for many the process of building a gay or lesbian identity in a re-
jecting society has helped in developing coping mechanisms that are useful in re-
sisting the stigma of aging (Altman, 1999; Sharpe, 2004).
Another way for service providers to become more comfortable and knowledge-
able about gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered sexuality is to attend a meet-
ing of Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (P-FLAG). Most large
cities have a chapter where visitors are welcome. The national organization main-
tains an extensive website at www.pflag.org containing much useful information.
Often, learning more about some basic approaches used in communicating
about sexuality can greatly improve a professional’s effectiveness in working
with older persons. For those interested in improving their ability to communi-
cate about elder sexuality, one area to focus on is the client’s level of sexual lan-
guage (Brock & Jennings, 1999). People vary in the vocabulary they use when
discussing sexuality. At least five levels of language may be used: scientific lan-
guage (vulva, coitus, ejaculate, fellatio, cunnilingus), common discourse (womb,
breasts, having sex, oral sex), euphemisms (down there, marital relations, come,
thing, it), street talk (fuck, screw, jack off, knockers, going down on, pussy), and
childhood (wee wee, weenie, boobies). Matching the client’s level of language and
careful questioning by the service provider can ensure that each fully under-
stands what the other intends to communicate and can ensure greater comfort for
all. When the professional is shocked or repulsed by street talk or amused at the
use of childhood language, clients may refuse to talk further. These may be the
only terms that some older adults know, so it is the responsibility of the profes-
sional to offer acceptance and comfort with their ways of talking. Over time, it
may be possible to help clients develop a more varied and appropriate approach
to discussing sexuality (Brock & Jennings, 1999).
In opening discussions of sexual topics, it is useful to begin with the least sen-
sitive topic and to be as open, comfortable, and matter-of-fact as possible. The