Бондарко А.В. (под ред.). Проблемы функциональной грамматики: Полевые структуры
Подождите немного. Документ загружается.
Aksu-Ko¸c A., Slobin D. A psychological account of the development and use
of evidentials in Turkish // Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epis-
temology. Norwood, 1986.
Barnes S., Gutfreund M., Satterly D., Wells G. Characteristics of adult speech
which predict children’s language development // Journal of Child Lan-
guage. 1983.
10.
Baron-Cohen S. Theory of mind and autism: a fifteen year review. Oxford,
2000.
Bascelli E., Barbieri M. S. Italian children’s understanding of the epistemic
and deontic modal verbs dovere (must) and potere (may) // Journal of
Child Language. 2002.
29.
Bassano D. Functional and formal constraints on the emergence of epistemic
modality: A longitudinal study of French // First Language. 1996.
16.
Benveniste E. Mutations of linguistic categories // Directions for historical
linguistics. London, 1968.
Bhat D. N. S. The adjectival category: criteria for differentiation and identifi-
cation. Amsterdam, 1994.
Blackburn F. The English Future, its origin and development. Leipzig, 1892.
453
Blas´eH.Geschichte des Plusquamperfekts im Lateinischen. Giessen, 1894.
Bleeck A. H. A concise grammar of the Persian language. London, 1857.
Bloom L. Language development from two to three. Cambridge, 1992.
Bogner I. Zur Entwicklung der periphrastischen Futurformen im Fr
¨
uhneu-
hochdeutschen // Zeitschrift f
¨
ur deutsche Philologie. 1989. Bd. 108.
Brandt W. Zukunftserz
¨
ahlen im Muspilli // Althochdeutsch. Bd. 1 / Hrsg.
von R. Bergmann, H. Tiefenbach, L. Voetz. Heidelberg, 1987.
Brinkmann H. Die deutsche Sprache: Gestalt und Leistung. 2. Aufl.
D
¨
usseldorf, 1971.
Brown R. A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, 1973.
Choi S. Children’s answers to yes-no questions: A development study in En-
glish, French and Korean // Developmental Psychology. 1991.
27(3).
Clancy P. The rise of the synthetic future tense in Romance // Romance
Philology. 1975. Vol. 38.
4.
Coates J. The acquisition of meaning of modality in children ages eight and
twelve // Journal of Child Language. 1988.
15.
Comrie B. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford, 1981.
Dal I. Kurze deutsche Syntax: Auf historischer Grundlage; 2. Aufl. T
¨
ubingen,
1962.
DaneˇsF.Syntaktick´y model a syntaktick´yvzorec//
ˇ
Ceskoslovensk´e
pˇrednaˇsky pro V mezin´arodni sjezd slavist˚u v Sofii. Praha, 1963.
DaneˇsF.A Three-Level Approach to Syntax // Travaux linguistiques de
Prague. L’´ecole de Prague d’aujourd’hui. 1. Prague, 1964.
DaneˇsF.The Relation of Centre and Periphery as a Language Universal //
Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 2: Les probl`emes du centre et de la
p´eriph´erie du syst`eme de la langue. Prague, 1966.
Dixon Robert M. W. Where have all the adjectives gone? Berlin; New York;
Amsterdam. 1982.
Dore J. “Oh them sheriff”: a pragmatic analysis of children’s responses to
questions // Child Discourse. New York, 1977.
Ernout A., Thomas F. Dictionnaire ´etymologique de la langue latine. Histoire
des mots. Paris, 1939.
Ervin-Tripp S. Discourse agreement: How children answer questions // Co-
gnition and the Development of Language. New York, 1970.
Ervin-Tripp S., Miller W. Early discourse: some questions about questions //
Interaction, Conversation, and the Development of Language. New York,
1997.
First verbs: On the way to miniparadigms // ZAS Papers in Linguistics. 2000.
Vol. 18.
454
Flavell J. H. Development of children knowledge about the mental world //
International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2000. Vol. 24,
1.
Fleischman S. The future in thought and language: Diachronic evidence from
romance. Cambridge, 1982.
Furrow D., Nelson K., Benedict H. Mothers’ speech to children and syntactic
development: Some simple relationships // Journal of Child Language.
1979.
6.
Gagarina N., Voeikova M., Gruzincev S. New version of morphological co-
ding for the speech production of Russian children (in the framework of
CHILDES) // Investigations into Formal Slavic Linguistics. Contributi-
ons of the Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic
Languages (FDSL-4). Frankfurt am Main; Berlin; Bern et al., 2003.
Galloway C., Richards B. J. Input and interaction in language acquisition.
Cambridge, 1994.
Gasser M., Smith L. Learning nouns and adjectives: a connectionist ac-
count // Language and Cognitive Processes. 1998. Vol. 13 (2/3).
Giv´on T. Prototypes: Between Plato and Wittgenstein // Noun Classes and
Categorization. Typological Studies in Language. Vol. 7. Amsterdam;
Philadelphia, 1986.
Giv´on T. Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam, 1995.
Gleitman L. R., Newport E. L., Gleitman H. The current status of the mothe-
rese hypothesis // Journal of Child Language. 1984.
11.
Guiraud-Weber M. Propositions sans nominatif en russe moderne. Paris, 1984.
Handford S. A. The latin subjunctive. London, 1947.
Harris Z. S. Co-occurrence and transformation in linguistic structure // Lan-
guage. 1957. Vol. 33,
3.
Havr´anek B., Jedliˇcka A.ˇcesk´a mluvnice. Praha, 1960.
Helbig G., Buscha J. Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch f
¨
ur den Ausl
¨
ander-
unterricht. 17. Aufl. Leipzig; Berlin; M
¨
unchen, 1996.
Hinsdale E.
¨
Uber die Wiedergabe des lateinischen Futurums bei den althoch-
deutchen
¨
Ubersetzern des 8–10 Jahrhunderts. G
¨
ottingen, 1897.
Hirts W., Weil J. Acquisition of the epistemic and deontic meaning of mo-
dals // Journal of Child Language. 1982.
9.
Hoff-Ginsberg E. Some contributions of mother’s speech to their children’s
syntactic growth // Journal of Child Language. 1985.
12.
Hoff-Ginsberg E., Shatz M. Linguistic input and the child’s acquisition of
language // Psychological Bulletin. 1982.
92.
Horn P. Neupersische Schriftsprache. Grundriss der iranischen Philologie.
Bd. 1. Strassburg, 1895–1901.
Ingram D. First language acquisition. Cambridge, 1989.
Johnson D. On Keenan’s definition of “subject of” // Linguistic inquiry. 1977.
Vol. 8,
4.
455
Justi F. Kurdische Grammatik. 1880.
Kalinovski G. Un aper¸cu ´el´ementaire des modalit´es d´eontiques // Langages.
1976.
43.
Kantorczyk U. Der Satztyp Vgorode(est’ ) universitet / U Igorja (est’) ma-
shina in der russischen Sprache der Gegenwart. Eine Komplexbeschrei-
bung unter formal-grammatischem, semantischem, kommunikativem und
referentiellem Aspekt // Slavistische Beitr
¨
age. Bd. 300. M
¨
unchen, 1993.
Karcevski S. Syst`eme du verbe russe. Prague, 1927.
Kazakovskaya V. Initial syntax development: ontogenesis of spatial syntax
structures (based on the language of Russian-speaking children) // Psy-
chology of Language and Communication. 2001. Vol. 5,
2.
Keenan E. Towards a universal definition of subject // Subject and topic.
New York, 1976.
Kempe V., Brooks P., Mironova N., Fedorova O. Diminutivization supports
gender acquisition in Russian children // Journal of Child Language.
2003. Vol. 30,
2.
Kempe V., MacWhinney B. The acquisition of case marking by adult learn-
ers of Russian and German // Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
1998. Vol. 20,
4.
Ketchian S. The poetry of A. Akhmatova: A conquest of time and space.
M¨unchen, 1986.
Kopeˇcn´yF.Slovesn´yvidvˇceˇstinˇe. Praha, 1962.
Kuczaj S., Maratsos M. P. What children can say before they will // Merrill-
Palmer Quarterly. 1975.
21.
Lakoff G. Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about
the mind. Chicago; London, 1988.
Langacker R. W. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I. Theoretical pre-
requisites. Stanford, 1987.
Lazard G. Grammaire du persan contemporain. Paris, 1957.
Leiss E. Zur Entstehung des neuhochdeutschen analytischen Futurs // Sprach-
wissenschaft. 1985. Bd. 10.
Leiss E. Die Verbalkategorien des Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der
sprachlichen Kategoriesierung. Berlin; New York, 1992.
Leumann M. Lateinisch habere mit Infinitiv // Museum Helveticum. 1962.
Bd. 19, fasc. 1.
Levy Y. Why are formal systems early to emerge? // Children’s Language.
Vol. 9. New Jersey, 1996.
Lieven E.V.M. Conversations between mothers and young children: Individ-
ual differences and their possible implications for the study of language
learning // The Development of Communication. Chichester, 1978.
MacKenzieD.N.Kurdish dialect studies.
1. London, 1961.
456
Mathesius V.
ˇ
Ceˇstina a obecn´y jazykozpyt. Praha, 1947.
McLaughlin B. Second Language Acquisition in Childhood. Vol. 1: Preschool
Children. New Jersey; London, 1984.
M´enard Ph. Syntaxe de l’ancien fran¸cais. Bordeaux, 1976.
Mills Anne E. The Acquisition of Gender. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York et
al., 1986.
Neustupn´yJ.On the Analysis of Linguistic Vagueness // Travaux linguistiques
de Prague, 2: Les probl`emes du centre et de la p´eriph´erie du syst`eme de
la langue. Prague, 1966.
Newport E. L., Gleitman H., Gleitman L. R. Mother I’d rather do it myself:
Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style // Talking to chil-
dren: Language input and acquisition. Cambridge, 1977.
Nichols J. Predicate Nominals: a Partial Surface Syntax of Russian // Lin-
guistics. Vol. 97. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London, 1981.
Ninio A., Snow C. Pragmatic Development. Boulder, 1996.
Orban C. Words, images and simultaneity in “Zang tumb tumb” and “Prose
du Transsiberien” // Romance notes. 1992. Vol. 33,
1.
Palmer F. R. Modality and the English Modals. New York, 1979.
Pavlov V. M. Die substantivische Zusammensetzung im Deutschen als syntak-
tisches Problem. M
¨
unchen, 1972.
Pinker S. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, 1984.
Pottier B. Sur la formulation des modalit´es en linguistique // Langages. 1976.
43.
Pr´ıruˇcn´ı mluvnice ˇceˇstiny. Brno, 1995.
Richards B. J. Language development and individual differences: A study of
auxiliary verb learning. Cambridge, 1990.
Rosch E. Natural categories // Cognitive Psychology. 1973.
4.
Saltveit L. Studien zum deutschen Futur. Bergen; Oslo, 1962.
Schmid H. Die Ausbildung des werden — Futurs:
¨
Uberlegungen auf der
Grundlage mittelalterlichen Endzeitprophezeiungen // Zeitschrift f
¨
ur
Dialektologie und Linguistik. 2000. Bd. 67.
Schmitt T. Weicheier, Warmduscher und Wochenendrasierer. Das W
¨
orterbuch
f
¨
ur Anf
¨
anger und Fortgeschrittene. M
¨
unchen, 2000.
Sehrt E. Notker=Glossar: Ein Althochdeutsch — Lateinisch — Neuhochdeut-
sches W
¨
orterbuch zu Notkers des Deutschen Schriften. T
¨
ubingen, 1962.
Skaliˇcka V. The Need for a Linguistics of “la parole”. Bratislava, 1948.
Snow C. E., Ferguson C. A. Talking to children. Cambridge, 1977.
Stephany U. Modality in first language acquisition // Modality in Language
Acquisition. Berlin; New York, 1993.
457
Sweetser E. E. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge, 1990.
Terras V. The Time Philosophy of Osip Mandel‘ˇstam // Slavonic and East
European Review. 1969. Vol. XLIII.
Tesni`ere L. Elements de syntaxe structurale. Paris, 1969.
Thieroff R. Das finite Verb im Deutschen: Tempus — Modus — Distanz.
T¨ubingen, 1992.
Timberlake A. Oblique control of Russian reflexivisation // Morphosyntax in
Slavic. Ohio, 1980.
Tomasel lo M. First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development.
Cambridge, 1992.
Tomasel lo M. Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language
acquisition. Cambridge, 2003.
Traugott E. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of
subjectification in semantic change // Language. 1989. N 65.
Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 2: Les probl`emes du centre et de la p´eriph´erie
du syst`eme de la langue. Prague, 1966.
Uspensky B. A. and Zhivov V. M. Center-periphery opposition and language
universals // Linguistics. 1977. Vol. 196.
Verheul K. The Theme of Time in the Poetry of Anna Axmatova. The Hague;
Paris, 1971.
Voeikova M. D. Russian existential sentences: a functional approach // LIN-
COM Studies in Slavic Linguistics. M¨unchen, 2000.
Walde A. Lateinisches Etymologisches W
¨
orterbuch. Bd. I. Heidelberg, 1938;
Bd. II. Heidelberg, 1954.
Wellman H. M., Lagatuta K. H. Developing understandings of mind // Un-
derstanding Other Minds. Perspectives From Developmental Cognitive
Neuroscience. Oxford, 2000.
Wells G. Learning through interaction: The study of language development.
Cambridge, 1983.
Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. New York, 1953.
Yevseyev V. Ikonizit
¨
at und Taxis. Ein Beitrag zur Nat
¨
urlichkeitstheorie am
Beispiel des Deutschen und Russischen // Europ
¨
aische Hochschulschrif-
ten. Reihe XXI, Linguistik. 2002. Bd./Vol. 254.
