Quantum Trajectories and Entanglement 51
5. Floyd, E. R., 2007, Welcher Weg? A trajectory representation of a quantum Young’s
experiment. Found. Phys. 37: 1403–20, arXiv:quant-ph/0605121v3.
6. Floyd, E. R., EPR-Bohr and quantum trajectories: entanglement and nonlocality.
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/1001.4575.
7. Bohm, D., 1953, A suggested interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms of “hidden”
variables. Phys. Rev. 85: 166–79.
8. Holland, P. R., 1993, The Quantum Theory of Motion, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, pp. 86–7, 141–6.
9. Floyd, E. R., 1982, Modified potential and Bohm’s quantum potential. Phys. Rev. D26:
1339–47.
10. Floyd, E. R., 1984, Arbitrary initial conditions of hidden variables. Phys. Rev. D29:
1842–4.
11. Floyd, E. R., 1986, Closed-form solutions for the modified potential. Phys. Rev. D34:
3246–9.
12. Floyd, E. R., 2002, The philosophy of the trajectory representation of quantum mechanics.
In Gravitation and Cosmology: From the Hubble Radius to the Planck Scale; Proceedings
of Symposium in Honour of the 80th Birthday of Jean-Pierre Vigier, ed. R. L. Amoroso,
G. Hunter, M. Kafatos, and J.-P. Vigier, 401–8. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Extended version arXiv:quant-ph/0009070v1.
13. Faraggi, A. E. and M. Matone, 2000, The equivalence principle of quantum mechanics.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15: 1869–2017, arXiv:hep-th/9809127v2.
14. Wyatt, R. E., 2005, Quantum Dynamics with Trajectories: Introduction to Quantum
Hydrodynamics. New York: Springer.
15. Fine, A. E., 2009, The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen argument in quantum theory, in
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2009 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta,
URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/qt-epr/> (accessed Novem-
ber 1, 2009).
16. Home, D. and A. Whitaker, 2007, Einstein’s Struggles with Quantum Theory, New York:
Springer, pp. 223–5.
17. Einstein, A., B. Podolski and N. Rosen, 1935, Can quantum mechanical description of
physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47: 777–80.
18. Floyd, E. R., 2000, Classical limit of the trajectory representation of quantum mechanics,
loss of information and residual indeterminacy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15: 1363–78,
arXiv:quant-ph/9907092v3.
19. Floyd, E. R., 1996, Where and why the generalized Hamilton–Jacobi representation
describes microstates of the Schrödinger wave function. Found. Phys. Lett. 9: 489–97,
arXiv:quant-ph/9707051v1.
20. Carroll, R., 1999, Some remarks on uncertainty and spin. Can. J. Phys. 77: 319–25,
quant-ph/9904081.
21. Carroll, R., 2000, Quantum Theory, Deformation and Integrability, Amsterdam: Elsevier,
pp. 50–56.
22. Carroll, R., Some remarks on time, uncertainty, and spin. http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/quant-
ph/9903081v1.
23. Peres, A., 1980, Measurement of time by quantum clocks. Amer. J. Phys. 48: 552–7.
24. Morse, P. M. and H. Feshbach, 1953, Methods of Theoretical Physics, Part II, New York:
McGraw-Hill, p. 1284.