Wishing to leave it in perpetuity to his descendants, he declared that       
whichever of his sons should, at his death, be found in possession           
thereof, by his bequest unto him, should be recognized as his heir,          
and be held by all the others in honor and reverence as chief and            
head. He to whom the ring was left held a like course with his own           
descendants, and did even as his father had done. In brief, the ring         
passed from hand to hand, through many generations, and came at last         
into the possession of a man who had three goodly and virtuous sons                   
all very obedient to their father, whereof he loved all three alike.         
The young men knowing the usance of the ring, each desiring to be            
the most honored among his folk... besought his father, who was now an             
old man, to leave him the ring.... The worthy man, who knew not              
himself how to choose to which he had liefer leave the ring, bethought       
himself... to satisfy all three, and privily let make by a good              
craftsman other two rings which were so like unto the first that he          
himself scarce knew which was the true. When he came to die he               
secretly gave each one of his sons his ring, wherefore each of them,         
seeking, after their father's death, to occupy the inheritance and the       
honor and denying it to the others, produced his ring in witness of          
his right, and the three rings being found so like one another that          
the true might not be known, the question which was the father's             
very heir abode pending and yet pendeth. And so I say to you, my lord:       
of the three Laws given by God the Father to the three peoples, each         
people deemeth itself to have His inheritance, His true Law and His          
commandments; but of which in very deed hath them, even as of the            
rings, the question yet pendeth.                                             
-                                                                            
    Such a story suggests that in his thirty-seventh year Boccaccio            
was not a dogmatic Christian. Contrast his tolerance with the bitter         
bigotry of Dante, who condemns Mohammed to perpetually repeated              
vivisections in hell. `050146 In the second story of    The Decameron                   
the Jew Jehannat is converted to Christianity by the argument (adapted       
by Voltaire) that Christianity must be divine, since it has survived         
so much clerical immorality and simony. Boccaccio makes fun of               
asceticism, purity, the confessional, relics, priests, monks,                
friars, nuns, even the canonization of saints. He thinks most monks          
are hypocrites, and laughs at the "simpletons" who give them alms (VI,