
Early Catholic immigrants in the US faced religious persecution from the Protestant
and nativist populations, though, with time, Catholic numbers afforded them a measure o
security against prejudice. They built schools and initiated strong mutual support
systems, including
parochial schools
and religious colleges. As they worked towards
assimilation
into US culture, tensions with Rome arose over the extent of interaction the
Church might have with this rapidly modernizing culture. The Papal condemnation o
this assimilation in 1890 suppressed attempts at change for nearly seventy years.
Ultimately however, the ghetto mentality of the Church in the US was fractured by the
election of John XXIII as Pope in 1958 and his calling of the Second Vatican Council
(1962–5), a watershed in the life of the Roman Catholic Church.
The Second Vatican Council had a dramatic effect on the lives of the faithful in the
United States. Among the changes instigated by the council, three stand out. The first is
the emphasis on the importance of the laity in the Church. As an increasingly affluent and
educated group of believers, Catholic laity in America desired a larger role in influencing
Church governance and in determining how their donations might be spent.
The second is the change in the language of the liturgy from Latin to English.
Previously, many congregants were unable to follow the Latin Tridentine liturgy and
would often be occupied in practices such as praying the Rosary during the Mass. With
the use of English, and with the priest now facing the people rather than with his back to
them, the laity were expected to participate actively in the Mass. This change resulted in
the expectation of many of the laity that they might take larger roles in the liturgy. These
expectations have been fulfilled to some extent, with lay people assisting in the
roclamation of the scripture and in the distribution of communion during the Mass as
well as, in many parishes, acting in advisory capacities in the decision-making of the
parish.
A third result of the council is the affirmation of the goodness in other faith traditions,
Christian and otherwise. In the time before the council, the Church taught that salvation
was available only through the Catholic Church and emphasized this point through the
discipline of the parish setting with its close-knit communities. Other Christians and
eople of other faiths could not receive the salvation of Jesus Christ, according to Church
teaching. In relation to other Christians, the council stated that the ideal for Christianity
was the restoration of Christian unity rather than the return of non-Catholic Christians to
the Roman Catholic Church. In relation to people of other faiths, the Council also
effectively conceded the possibility of revelation outside the Christian faith, a concession
unique among Christian denominations. Thus, the RCC no longer considers itself the
unique path to salvation, only the pre-eminent one. This position is a remarkable
turnaround for the Church and one that has led to continued tension and confusion among
some of the faithful as it has called into question the centrality of the Church for
community and for the faith of the laity
In reaction to these changes in the selfunderstanding of the Church, groups espousing
the older teachings of the Church have arisen since the council. Some groups have
lobbied for the return to the Latin Tridentine Mass, others have emphasized more
Encyclopedia of Contemporary American Culture 976