
increased the demand for a stronger NCAA, which would actually suspend or expel
recalcitrant colleges.
Television further enhanced the NCAA’s authority. First, colleges needed the NCAA
to negotiate with
networks
to ensure that television did not take away the large crowds
commonly attending football games. Later, the colleges wanted the NCAA to negotiate
lucrative financial packages with the networks, a process successfully capped in 1994 by
CBS’ agreement to pay $1.745 billion to cover basketball’s Final Four until 2002.
Since the 1950s, the NCAA has enforced a detailed code of regulations written and
voted on by members of colleges and universities. It has assisted members of schools in
complying with these regulations, administered more than seventy annual championships
for both men and women,
roduced collegiate rules of play for twelve sports and
compiled and distributed statistics in football and basketball, as well as publishing a
weekly newspaper. It has divided colleges into different divisions, setting rules for
student athletes in each of those divisions, and, in quite intrusive ways, has governed all
college-level sport.
In effect, the NCAA has governed over the establishment of farm systems for the
major leagues, especially the NBA and NFL. Apprentice athletes bring millions of dollars
to their colleges without receiving any payment beyond scholarships, instead playing for
the opportunity to be selected as one of the yearly draft picks (achieved by only a small
ercentage). The Heisman Trophy winner, the best player in college football, is assured
of being a first-round draft pick and of receiving a very handsome salary from the team
that selects him; so are the best ten to fifteen basketball players. With stakes so high and
the demands on the body so extreme in some college sports, as
The Program
(1993)
showed, many student athletes engage in widespread use of
steroids
and accomplish little
academically. With scholarships tied to sports eligibility these apprentices tend not to
graduate from their colleges, and those who do not make the majors end up with little to
show for their labor on behalf of their colleges.
In January 1983, the NCAA adopted Proposition 48 to counteract this problem, placing
the blame for the failure of the student athlete on the athletes themselves and their lack o
reparation for college rather than on the practices of college sports programs. The
roposition required incoming student athletes attending a Division I school to have a
minimum 2.0 high-school grade-
oint average in a core curriculum of eleven courses and
a minimum score of 700 (later raised to 820 out of a possible 1,600) on the Scholastic
Aptitude Test (SAT) in order to compete as a freshman. In its first year in effect, 1986,
the proposition prevented almost 700 incoming freshmen from participating in their
respective sports.
This proposition has been widely criticized, especially by Georgetown coach, John
Thompson, and former Celtics great Bill Russell, who believe that it cuts of
opportunities to
African Americans
in particular. Harry Edwards has noted the racial
bias of SATs, but he (supported early on by Arthur
Ashe
) has backed the proposition,
seeing it as a first step to rectify a problem that has seen large numbers of black athletes
fail in college. The fact that only 31 percent of
African American
male athletes admitted
Encyclopedia of Contemporary American Culture 782