
lntroduction
Discussion
2  Put the learners in groups 
of 
three 
or 
four 
and 
ask them 
to
share their 
ideas. 
Remind them to use'must' and'mustn't'.
3  Tell 
them 
to prepare Ten Rules for Learning English 
and 
to
write them down on a sheet of 
paper.
4  When 
all the 
groups have finished making 
their 
rules, 
collect
their ideas and write them up on the board.
The most 
obvious difference between the two activities is 
in 
the
way they are organized. In Activity  1 the teacher is talking, first to
the whole 
class, 
then 
to 
individual learners. In Activity 2 
the
learners 
are talking to each other 
in 
small 
groups.
This 
type of 
learner-learner 
interaction in 
pairs 
or 
groups provides
far more 
practice in 
using the language than the more traditional
teacher-learner interaction. In a class of twenty learners, a 
twenty-
minute 
activity where 
the 
teacher asks the learners 
questions 
will
give 
the learners a total of only about ten 
minutes' 
speaking time,
i.e. half 
a 
minute 
each. 
And 
the teacher 
(who 
doesn't 
need 
the
practice!) gets 
ten whole 
minutes' 
speaking time. In contrast, a
twenty-minute activity where learners are working in 
groups,
asking and 
answering 
each other's questions, will give them many
more opportunities 
for practice.
Both activities 
provide 
a 
lot 
of repetition of the structure'must
(+ 
verb)', 
and 
both do so in a fairly controlled way. 
In Activity  1,
the control is provided by the teacher who tells the 
learners 
what to
do. 
In Activity 2, control is 
provided 
by the example sentences on
the board. However, 
Activity I provides 
repetition 
with no 
context.
The sentences are random and unrelated. Such repetition is
virtually meaningless: the 
learners are 
simply 
repeating the
structure. 
They have no idea why they are saying the sentences, and
in fact it would be 
possible 
to do the activity 
without
understanding a word! 
In Activity 2, 
there 
is 
a context-making
rules for learning English-and  all the communication 
is 
related 
to
this context. 
This makes the 
activity 
much more meaningful for the
learners.
In Activity 1, the learners have no sense of 
purpose 
in 
producing
their sentences; 
they 
are 
merely doing what the teacher tells them,
and 
the 
only 
purpose 
of 
their repetition is to 
practise 
the structure.
In 
Activity 2, 
however, the 
learners have 
a 
goal-making  the
rules-and  the language 
is 
used for the 
purpose 
of achieving this
goal. This mirrors real-life situations much more closely, as well as
making the activity 
more interesting 
and 
motivating for 
the
learners.