
384 5 Epilogue
The removal of the viscous contribution involves U
o
 -> 0 and 0t -> oo,
which clearly destroys the character of our KVB equation: we cannot
recover the KdV equation in the way we might have expected (but it does
arise if
 we
 let 0t -> 0). Nevertheless, we have succeeded in our intention
to find a limiting process that balances KdV nonlinearity and dispersion
against Burgers nonlinearity and dissipation.
The KVB equation, (5.75), possesses a number of interesting features.
First, it and our model admit a steady solution; second, the damping (or
dissipative) term
has a negative coefficient if
Co
 >f.
 (5.76)
This condition implies an energy input and, presumably, we must antici-
pate that our model is no longer valid. In fact the speed of the surface
wave is, to leading order as e -> 0,
 2UQ,
 and all speeds have been non-
dimensionalised with respect to y^o^o* g
0
 = gcosa; thus 2U
0
 is the
Froude number of the wave. Thus, when we write F
 —
 2U
0
, condition
(5.76) becomes
F
2
 >\ or F>1.58.
Now it is commonly observed that bores with F larger than about 1.2
have turbulent, breaking fronts; on the other hand, if F is less than this
(but, of
 course,
 F > 1; see Section 2.7), we typically observe the undular
bore.
 This suggests that our model has captured an important phenom-
enon (even though the values do not quite correspond); indeed, Dressier
(1949) has shown that the condition F
2
 > 5/2 heralds the formation of
roll
 waves, which, locally, have the appearance of turbulent bores.
This brie
f discussion of the role of laminar viscosity in water-wave
theory is brought to a close as we present a few observations on the
steady solutions of the KVB equation, (5.75). We seek a solution in the
form 7/
0
(£
 —
 cr), to give
-crjo
 +
 ^U
o
r]
O
rjo
 +
 2U
0
r]Q
f
 =
 —
 (1
 - -
 C/o)*7o
which, after one integration in f =
 £
 —
 ex and imposing the condition
rj
0
 -> 0 as f
 ->
 +oo, yields