condensation (step-growth) polymerization. In random scis-
sion, the polymer radical is both highly reactive and sur-
rounded by an abundance of secondary hydrogens. This type
of thermal degradation will therefore be favored if transfer is
significant. Transfer reactions, in which a long-chain radical
attacks another chain (intermolecular) or itself (intramo-
lecular), produce fragments larger than monomer and pro-
mote random chain scission.
In both chain depolymerization and random scission,
thermal degradation is a free-radical chain reaction. Initi-
ation, which is the splitting of the chain to form radicals,
may occur at chain ends, at ‘‘weak links’’, or at random
points along the chain structure. Radical degradation often
leads to crosslinking which can be visualized as resulting
from the combination of radical sites on adjacent chains.
Chain cleavage can occur either by primary homolytic skel-
etal cleavage or by an intramolecular attack by a terminal
radical unit on its own chain. It is possible to differentiate
between chain depolymerization and random scission in
some cases by following the molecular weight of the residue
as a function of the extent of reaction. Specifically, the
ultimate product of random scission is likely to be a disperse
mixture of fragments of molecular weight up to several
hundred, whereas chain depolymerization yields large quan-
tities of monomer.
In degradation by substituent reactions, the substituents
attached to the polymer-chain backbone are modified or
eliminated. Any volatile products evolved will therefore be
chemically unlike monomer. The most prominent example
of degradation via substituent reaction is poly(vinyl chlor-
ide) (PVC). Like all thermoplastics, PVC is processed
at about 200 8C at which temperature it loses HC1 quite
rapidly and is converted to a deeply colored polyene
polymer, i.e.,
---CH
2
---CHCl---CH
2
---CHC1 !---CH ¼CH---CH ¼CH---þ 2HCl:
The actual degradation mechanism is more complex than
implied by this simple reaction. If substituents reactions
occur, they generally ensue at temperatures (T < 150 8C)
below that of degradation reactions in which the backbone
bonds are broken. Consequently, the reactivity of the sub-
stituents relative to that of the polymer backbone will
largely dictate whether a particular polymer undergoes ther-
mal degradation by substituent reactions or by reactions
involving the backbone (e.g., chain depolymerization and
random scission) [1–11].
54.2 STRUCTURE–PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS
Polymers decompose at significantly lower temperatures
than model compounds, perhaps by as much as 200 8C. The
main reasons are twofold: (1) polymer molecules often
incorporate reactive structural abnormalities (‘‘weak
links’’) absent in the model compound; and (2) polymer
degradation can lead to chain processes, not accessible to
model compounds, which accelerate the degradation reac-
tion. The limited thermal stability of organic high polymers
is due to several factors, including: (1) C–C bonds are
relatively weak and oxidatively unstable; (2) fragmentation
of the polymer during degradation is entropy favored; and
(3) the presence of terminal catalytic sites, reactive atoms
(e.g., tertiary H atoms), and ‘‘weak links’’ (e.g., branch
points) along the chain which initiate decomposition [1–11].
The thermal stability and mode of decomposition of a
polymer are determined by both physical and chemical
factors [1–11]. In many cases, the maximum service tem-
perature of polymers is limited not by the breaking of
chemical bonds but rather by changes in physical character-
istics at elevated temperatures. While retaining their chem-
ical structures, they become weak, soft, and eventually fluid.
The physical requirement of a thermally stable polymer is
that it has high melting or softening temperature. The same
factors that raise T
g
and T
m
, namely, chain rigidity and
strong interchain forces, also raise thermal stability. Chain
rigidity can be conferred by ring structures linked by collin-
ear or para chain-extending bonds, while strong interchain
attractions are attained by (intermolecular) dipolar and
hydrogen-bonding interactions. The introduction of polar
groups (e.g., CN, Cl, F) and hydrogen-bonding groups
(e.g., –OH, –C(O)NH–) will often raise the melting and
softening points appreciably. Stereoregularity in a vinyl-
type polymer can produce a dramatic positive effect on
thermal stability. For example, atactic polystyrene is
amorphous with a T
g
of about 80 8C while isotactic poly-
styrene is crystalline with a T
m
of about 230 8C. The regular
structure of the latter fits more readily into a crystalline
lattice, and intermolecular forces are more difficult to over-
come. Short bulky sidegroups (e.g., ---CH
3
in polypropylene)
can actually increase the melting point by reducing chain
mobility, but long bulky sidegroups tend to reduce the
melting point by disrupting the efficiency of chain packing.
Crystalline forms of polymers are more resistant to oxida-
tion than amorphous forms due to oxygen-permeability dif-
ferences. For amorphous polymers, polymers oxidize more
rapidly above than below their T
g
due to the faster rate of
diffusion of oxygen. Surface regions are particularly sus-
ceptible to oxidative degradation.
The chemical factors which influence thermal stability
are more diverse than the physical factors. Of primary
importance, heat-resistant polymers require bonds of high
dissociation energy. For example, poly(tetrafluoroethylene)
(PTFE) is superior to PE and many other polymers in terms
of thermal stability. The stability conferred by fluorine
substitution is clearly associated with the relatively high
value for the dissociation energy of C–F bonds. In fact,
PTFE [---CF
2
CF
2
---] is the most stable and most widely
applied of the fluorinated polymers. Since the strong C–F
bond renders transfer unlikely, chain depolymerization of
PTFE gives high yields of monomer.
Van Krevelen [12] found a reasonably linear correlation
between the half-decomposition temperature T
1=2
and the
928 / CHAPTER 54