
number of years, as well as those years that are more moist or
dry, according to the size of their rings.
In addition to Leonardo, others also noted that ring width
and climate were linked, and that patterns in trees could be
matched across space and time. However, it was never pursued
to the extent that chronologies were built and reconstructions
of climate into the past were attempted. The development of
dendrochronology as a scientific field came later, in the early
twentieth century, under the guidance of Andrew Ellicott
Douglass.
Douglass was an astronomer residing at the Lowell Obser-
vatory in Flagstaff Arizona (Webb, 1983). In 1904, he found
that a distinct pattern of narrow and wide growth rings in con-
ifer log sections, cut from the Flagstaff area, could be matched
with trees from as far away as Prescott, some 150 kilometers
distant. This led him to recognize the nature of a general con-
trol on tree-growth that was variable on an annual time scale
and was most likely related to climate. Later, in 1911, Douglass
recognized the real significance of his observation, and deter-
mined that the influence of climate was the major contributor
to the common variability evident in the annual radial growth
of trees. He recognized that, in the arid American Southwest,
precipitation was the factor most limiting to tree growth. There-
fore, tree growth could in turn be used as a proxy for rainfall
before the time of the instrumental record.
Douglass had developed and utilized the principle of cross-
dating, or pattern matching, as the basis for the science of den-
drochronology. He realized that the simple counting of growth
rings could result in errors of years or even decades over a span
of hundreds of years of record. Douglass’ procedure involved
the rigorous detection of “locally absent” and “false” rings
through sample replication and reproducibility of specific pat-
terns. This procedure, facilitated by graphical skeleton plotting
(Stokes and Smiley, 1968), allowed Douglass to accurately
assign calendar dates to rings even when growth was highly
stressed, as in the case of arid site conifers (Douglass, 1919).
Through the development of master chronologies he was able
to use this powerful new tool to compare and match growth
patterns across a very broad region, allowing for the exact dat-
ing of annual rings from both living and dead trees. It was not
long before this process led to the dating of aboriginal ruins
from across the desert Southwest (Haury, 1962), making den-
drochronology one of the most significant tools in the field of
archaeology.
Dendrochronology makes use of distinct annual growth ring
patterns as markers in time. Wood volume (ring width) and
density are the two most common features used for the cross-
dating procedure. By matching the patterns of growth from
living trees of known age with similar patterns in the wood
from progressively older trees, one can extend the time scale
backward into the distant past. These distinct patterns can
then be used for the accurate dating of events that somehow
affected the growth or life of individual trees (Fritts, 1976).
Any event that kills one or more trees, or otherwise leaves an
impact at a particular year, can be fixed accurately in time
through dendrochronology and crossdating. Examples of this
can be seen throughout the literature, from the dating of build-
ings and other wooden artifacts (Haury, 1962; Baillie, 1982), to
the determination of precise years of earthquake movements
(Jacoby et al., 1989; Sheppard and Jacoby, 1989), and to
the detection of epic droughts that caused mass mortality
in the early North American settlements (Stahle et al., 1998).
The application of dendrochronology can be used as an
important tool in many different fields, including ecology,
archaeology, geomorphology, hydrology, and biogeography, to
name a few. However, in no field has dendrochronology played
a more significant role than in the field of climatology (see
Dendroclimatology).
Dendrochronology is possible because climate influences
tree growth across space and time to such an extent that there
will be common variability expressed in the pattern of annual
radial growth across broad regions (Douglass, 1919; Fritts,
1976; Hughes et al., 1982; Cook and Kairiukstis, 1990). The
extent to which climate exerts its uniform influence determines
how strong the agreement between trees will be. For that rea-
son, the tree ring chronologies with the greatest fidelity are
from regions where climate is at its most limiting to growth,
and most regionally coherent. Extremes of temperature and
moisture availability produce the greatest variability in annual
radial growth, and are therefore the areas where crossdating is
most readily achieved. Trees growing in regions with little cli-
mate variability and optimum conditions for growth are less
likely to produce the high variability in growth pattern that
allows for accurate crossdating. This simple tenet has become
known as the Principle of Limiting Factors (Fritts, 1976), and
along with crossdating forms the nucleus for the field.
The annual growth ring
The annual growth layer or “tree ring” is central to the science
of dendrochronology. It can be described as a growth band in
the xylem of a tree or shrub with anatomically definable bound-
aries, and is formed during a single annual period of cambial
activity (Kozlowski, 1971; Fritts, 1976; Esau, 1977; Salisbury
and Ross, 1992). Growth rings are actually sheaths of cells
generated in the vascular cambium, between the prior year’s
growth and the bark, and they appear as concentric rings in
a cross section of the stem. The annual growth cycle is
described using the simplest case scenario of a temperate zone
conifer. In the spring when moisture is plentiful, energy is
devoted to the production of new growth cells. These first
new growth cells are large, but as the summer progresses, cell
size decreases until the short days and cool temperatures of
autumn arrive and growth stops altogether. This process is
called “hardening off,” where the cell walls thicken in prepara-
tion for the freezing temperatures of winter. New growth begins
anew the following spring with the arrival of longer days and
warming temperatures. The contrast between the smaller,
thicker-walled old cells of the end of the growth season (late-
wood) and the following year’s larger, thinner-walled new cells
(earlywood) forms the visible ring boundary typical of conifers
(Figure D14). Initiation of cambial activity in the spring
appears to be related to the resumption of bud growth, while
its termination is likely correlated with the cessation of shoot
extension (Digby and Wareing, 1966). While initial cambial
activity has been linked to the downward movement of growth
substances from the expanding buds, continued cambial growth
is driven by a local source of auxin that is probably supplied by
the differentiating xylem (Samish, 1954; Sheldrake, 1971).
During cambial activity, the newly formed cells differentiate
into phloem and xylem. The phloem forms on the bark side of
the cambium and serves as a conduit for transporting photo-
synthate downward from the leaves, while the xylem grows
on the inner side of the cambium and transports water and
nutrients upward (Nobel, 1974; Shigo, 1984). In some sense,
each new ring can be viewed as a whole new functioning tree
that completely envelops and replaces the previous year’s
240 DATING, DENDROCHRONOLOGY