Одинцова М.И. Экономика права
Подождите немного. Документ загружается.
Arrow, K.J. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. // The Rate and
Direction of Inventory Activity: Economic and Social Factors, ed.R.R.Nelson. Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1962, pp. 609-626.
Arundel A. The Relative Effectiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation. // Research
Policy. 2001.Vol. 30. N. 4. P. 611-624.
Barnes D., Stout L. Cases & Materials on Law and Economics. American Casebook Series. West
Publishing Co., St Paul, Minnesota. 1992.
Barzel Y. Optimal Timing of Innovations. // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1968 Vol.50.
N. 3. P. 348-355.
Bebchuk L.A., Shavell S. Information and the Scope of Liability for Breach of Contract: The
Rule of “Hadley v. Baxendale”. //Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 1991. Vol. 7.
N. 2. P. 284-312
Becker G.S. The Economics of Discrimination. Сhicago: Сhicago University Press. 1957.
Вishop W. The Contract-Tort Boundary and the Economics of Insurance. //The Journal of Legal
Studies.1983. Vol. 12. N . 1. P. 241. -266.
Bix B. A Dictionary of Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004
Brenner R. Economics – An Imperialist Science?// The Journal of Legal Studies. 1980. Vol. 9.
N. 1. P.179-188.
Brown J. Toward an Economic Theory of Liability. // The Journal of Legal Studies. Vol 2.
1973. N.2. P. 323-349.
Buchanan J., Yoon Y. Symmetric Tragedies: Commons and Anticommons Property. // Journal
of Law and Economics. 2000. Vol. 43. N. 1 . P. 1-13.
Calabresi G. About Law and Economics: A Letter To Ronald Dworkin.// Hofstra Law Review
1980. Vol 8. P. 553-562. In: Posner R., Parisi F. Law and Economics, 1997. Vol 1. P. 27-36.
Calabresi G. Some Thoughts of Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts. // The Yale Law Journal,
1961, Vol. 70. N.4. P. 499-553.
Calabresi G. The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven and London:
Yale University Press. 1970.
Calabresi G. The Pointlessness of Pareto: Carrying Coase Further. // The Yale Law Journal.
1991. Vol.111. No. 5. P.1211-1237.
Calabresi G., Melamed D.C. Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of
the Cathedral. // Harvard Law Review, 1972. Vol. 85, No. 6. P. 1089 - 1128.
Chung T-Y. Comparative Negligence. // Newman P. (ed.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of
Economics and the Law. Macmillan Ref. Lmd. 1998. Vol.1. P. 352-354.
272
Coase R. Economics and Contiguous Disciplines. // The Journal of Legal Studies. 1978. Vol.
7.N. 2. P. 201-211.
Coase R. Law and Economics at Chicago. //Journal of Law and Economics. 1993. Vol. 36. N. 1,
Part 2. P. 239-254.
Соаse R. The Problem of Social Cost. //Journal of Law and Economics. 1960. Vol. 3. N. 1 . P.
1-44.
Cohen W., Nelson R., Walsch J. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions
and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not). // NBER Working Paper W 7552, 2000.
Cooter R. The Cost of Coase. // The Journal of Legal Studies. 1982. Vol. 11. N. 1 P. 1-33.
Cooter R. Economic Theories of Legal Liability. // The Journal of Economic Perspectives.
Vol.5. N.3. P. 11-30.
Cooter R. Unity in Tort, Contract, and Property: The Model of Precaution.// California Law
Review. 1985. Vol.73. N. 1. P. 1-51.
Cooter R., Gordley J. Economic Analysis in Civil Law Countries: Past, Present, Future.//
International Review of Law and Economics. 1991. Vol. 11. N. 2. P. 261-263.
Cooter D., Kornhauser L., Lane D. Liability Rules, Limited Information and the Role of
Precedent. // The Bell Journal of Economics.1979.Vol.10. N.2. P. 366-373.
Сooter R., Ulen T. An Economic Case for Comparative Negligence. // New York University
Law Review. 1986 Vol. 61. P. 1067-1110.
Сооter R. Ulen T. Law and Economics. Addison-Wesley. 3d ed. 1999.
Craswell R. Passing on the Costs Legal Rules: Efficiency and Distribution in Buyer-Seller
Relations. //Stanford Law Review. 1991. Vol. 43. N. 2. P. 361-398.
Curran Chr. Optimal Techniques of Redistribution. // Encyclopedia of Law and Economics,
Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. P. 301-310.
Davis L. Patents and Innovations: A Strategic Perspective. // Riis T., Nielsen R. (Eds.) Law and
Economics. Methodology and Application. Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing. 1998. P.11-31.
Dam K.W. The Economic Underpinnings of Patent Law.//The Journal of Legal Studies. 1994.
Vol. 23. N. 1. P. 247-267.
Dawkins R. The Selfish Gene. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
De Alessi L., Staaf R. Subjective Value in Contract Law. //Journal of Institutional and
Theoretical Economics. 1989. Vol 145. N. 2. P. 361-377.
De Geest G. The Debate on the Scientific Status of Law and Economics. //European Economic
Review. 1996. Vol. 40. N. 3-5. P. 999-1006.
273
Denicolo V., Franzoni L.A. The Contract Theory of Patents. // International Review of Law and
Economics. 2004. Vol.23. N. 4. P. 365-380.
Demsetz H. Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint. //Journal of Law and Economics.
1969. Vol. 12. N. 1. P.1-22.
Depoorter B., Parisi F. Fair Use and Copyright Protection: Price Theory Explanation.//
International Review of Law and Economics. 2002. Vol. 21. N.4 . P.453-473.
Diamond P., Maskin E. An Equilibrium Analysis of Search and Breach of Contract I: Steady
States.// The Bell Journal of Economics. 1979. Vol. 10. N.1. P. 281-316.
Dnes A. The Economics of Law. L.: International Business Press, 1996.
Duggan A. Unconscionability. // P. Newman ( ed.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
and the Law. Vol.1. P. 211-214.
Dworkin R. Is Wealth a Value? // The Journal of Legal Studies.1980. Vol. 9. No. 2. P.191-226.
Epstein R. Unconscionability: A Critical Reappraisal. // Journal of Law and Economics. 1975.
Vol 18. N. 2. P. 293-315.
Epstein R. Law and Economics: Its Glorious Past and its Cloudy Future. //The University of
Chicago Law Review. 1997. Vol. 64. N. 4 P. 1167- 1174.
Farnsworth W. Do Parties to Nuisance Cases Bargain After Judgment? A Glimpse Inside the
Cathedral. // Behavioral Law and Economics. Ed. By C. Sunstein. Cambridge University Press,
2000. P. 302-321.
Friedman D., Landes W., Posner R. Some Economics of Trade Secret Law. // The Journal of
Economic Perspectives, 1991. Vol.5. N. 1, P. 61-72.
Goetz Ch., Scott R. Liquidated Damages, Penalties and the Just Compensation Principle: Some
Notes on an Enforcement Model and a Theory of Efficient Breach. // Columbia Law Review.
1977 . Vol.77. N. 4. P.554-594.
Gordon W. Fair Use as a Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax
Case and its Predecessors. // Columbia Law Review.1982.Vol. 82, N.8. P. 1600-1657.
Grady M. Untaken Precaution .//The Journal of Legal Studies. 1989.Vol.18 N.1 P. 139- 156.
Grady M. Common Law Control of Strategic Behavior: Railroad Sparks and the Farmer. //The
Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 17. N. 1 P. 15-42.
Grady M.,Alexander J. Patent Law and Rent Dissipation. //Virginia Law Review. 1992. No 1.
Vol.78. P.305-350.
Grindley P., Teece D. Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semi-
Conductors and Electronics. // California Management Review. 1997. Vol. 39. P. 8-41.
Johansen L. The Bargaining Society and the Inefficiency of Bargaining. //KΥKLOS. 1979. Vol.
32. Fasc.3. P.497-522.
274
Jolls Ch. Behavioral Economic Analysis of Redistributive Legal Rules. // Behavioral Law and
Economics. Ed. By C. Sunstein. Cambridge University Press, 2000. P.288- 301.
Joskow P.Commercial Impossibility, the Uranium Market and the “Westinghouse” Case. // The
Journal of Legal Studies 1976.Vol 16 . N. P. 119-176.
Hardiman R. Toward The Right of Commerciality. // UCLA Law Review. 1987. Vol. 34. P.
207-264.
Hardin G. The Tragedy of the Commons. // Science. 1968. Vol. 162. N. 3859. P.1243-1248.
Harsanyi J. Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior. // Utilitarianism and Beyond. Ed. by
Sen A. And Williams B. Cambridge University Press, 2002. P. 39-62.
Harsanyi J. Cardinal Welfare, Cardinalistic Value, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.
//The Journal of Political Economy. 1955. Vol.63. N. 4. P.309-321.
Hatzis A. Having the Cake and Eating It Too: Efficient Penalty Clauses in Common an Civil
Contract Law. //International Review of Law and Economics. 2003. Vol.22. N. 3. P. 381-406.
Heller M., Eisenberg R. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical
Research. //Science. 1998.Vol. 280, N. 5364. P. 698-701.
Hicks J. The Foundations of Welfare Economics. //Economic Journal, 1939.Vol. 49. N. 196 P.
696-712.
Hirshleifer J. The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity.
// The American Economic Review. 1971. Vol. 61. N. 4. P. 561-574.
Hobbes Th. Leviathan. Collier-Macmillan. 1973.
Kahneman D., Tversky A. Eds. Judgement under Uncertainty: Biases and Heuristics, 1982.
N.Y. Cambridge University Press.
Kaldor N. Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.//
Economic Journal, 1939. Vol.49. N. 195. P. 549-552.
Kaplow L., Shavell S. The Conflict between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle.//
American Law and Economics Review. 1999. Vol. 1. N. 1. P. 63-77.
Kaplow L., Shavell S. Economic Analysis of Law. // Handbook of Public Economics. Ed. by
A.J.Auerbach, M. Feldstein. Elsevier Science. 2002. Vol. 3. Ch. 25. P. 1665-1784.
Kaplow L., Shavell S. Property Rules versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis. // Harvard
Law Review. 1996. Vol. 109. P. 713-734.
Kaplow L., Shavell S. Why the Legal System is Less Efficient than the Income Tax in
Redistributing Income.// The Journal of Legal Studies. 1994. Vol.23. N. 2. P. 667-681
Kerkmeester H. Methodology: General. // Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Cheltenham,
UK: Edward Elgar. P.383-401.
275
Kerkmeester H., Visscher L. Learned Hand in Europe: a Study in the Comparative Law and
Economics of Negligence. // German Working Papers in Law and Economics. Vol. 2003. Paper 6
http://www.bepress.com/gwp
Kitch E. The Nature and Function of the Patent System. // Journal of Law and Economics. 1977.
Vol. 20. No. 2. P. 265-290.
Kitch E. Patents. // P. Newman (ed.) The Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law.
Macmillan Ref. Lmd. 1998. Vol. 3. P.13-17.
Klemperer P. How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be? // TheRAND Journal of
Economics. 1990. Vol. 21. N.1 P. 113-130.
Koetz H. Precontractual Duties of Disclosure: A Comparative and Economic Perspective.//
European Journal of Law and Economics. 2000. Vol. 9. N. 5. P. 5-19.
Kremer M. Patent Buyouts: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation. // The Quarterly Journal
of Economics. 1998. Vol 113. No. 4. P.1137-1167.
Krier J., Schwab S. Property Rules and Liability Rules: The Cathedral in Another Light. //New
York University Law Review. 1995. Vol. 70. P. 440- 483.
Kronman A. Contract Law and Distributive Justice. //The Yale Law Journal. 1980. Vol. 89. N. 3.
P. 472-511.
Kronman A. Contract Law and the State of Nature.// Journal of Law, Economics and
Organization. 1985. Vol. 1. N. 1 p. 5-32.
Kronman A. Mistake, Disclosure, Information, and the Law of Contracts. // The Journal of Legal
Studies, 1978. Vol. 7. N. 1 P. 1- 34.
Kronman A. Specific Performance. //The University of Chicago Law Review. 1978. Vol. 45. N.
2. P. 351-382.
Landes W., Posner R. An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law. // The Journal of Legal Studies.
1989, Vol.18. N. 2. P. 325-363.
Landes W.M., Posner R. The Economic Structure of Tort Law Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press.1987.
Landes W. M., Posner R.A The Influence of Economics on Law: A Quantitative Study. //Journal
of Law and Economics . 1993. Vol. 36, No.1 Part 2. P.385-424
Landes W., Posner R. The Positive Economic Theory of Tort Law. // Posner R., Parisi F. (eds.)
Law and Economics. Elgar Reference Collection, 1997, Vol. II, P. 259-329.
Landes W., Posner R. Trademark Law: An Economic Perspective.// Journal of Law and
Economics. 1987. Vol.30. N.2. P.265-309.
Lando H., Rose C. On the Enforcement of Specific Performance in Civil Law Countries.
//International Review of Law and Economics. 2004. Vol. 24. N. 4. P. 473-487.
276
Law and Economics in Civil Law Countries. /Ed. By Deffains B., Kirat Th. Amsterdam.:
Elsevier Science B.V. 2001.
Levin R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R., Winter S.G. Appropriating the Returns from
Industrial Research and Development. // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987. Vol. 3.
N. 3. P.783-820.
McFetridge, Smith Patents, Prospects and Economic Surplus: A Comment.// Journal of Law and
Economics, 1980. Vol.23, No. 1. P.197-203.
Machlup F., Penrose E. The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century. // The Journal of
Economic History. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 1-29.
Machlup F. An Economic Review of the Patent System. Study No. 15 of the Subcommittee on
Patents,Trademarks and Copyrights of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate, 85
th
Cong.,2d Sess., Washington, DC:Government Printing Office.
Mackaay E. History of Law and Economics. // Encyclopedia of Law and Economics,
Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. P. 65-117.
Manne H. Insider Trading and the Stock Market. New York: Free Press. 1966
Мattei U. Comparative Law and Economics. Ann Arbor. The University of Michigan Press.
1997.
Mazzoleni R., Nelson R. The Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protection: a Contribution to
the Current Debate. // Research Policy, 1998. Vol 27. No.3. P. 273-284.
Mercuro N., Medema S. Economics and the Law. From Posner to Post-Modernism. Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1997.
Merges R., Nelson N. On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope. // Columbia Law Review,
1990. Vol.90. No. 4. P. 839-916.
Merges R.P. The End of Fiction? Property Right and Contract in the Newtonian World of On-
line Commerce. // Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 1997. Vol 12.N.1.
http://web.archive.org/web20040602170754/www.law.berkeley.edu/jou...
Merryman H.J. The Civil Law Tradition. An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western
Europe and Latin America. 2d ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.1985.
Miceli Th. Cause in Fact, Proximate Cause and the Hand Rule: Extending Grady’s Positive
Economic Theory of Negligence.// International Review of Law and Economics. 1996. Vol. 16.
N. 4. P. 473-482.
Mill J.S. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy.
1872.
Nash J. The Bargaining Problem. // Econometrica. 1950. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 155-162.
277
Nelson R. The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research. //The Journal of Political
Economy. 1959.Vol. 67. N. 3. P. 297-306.
Nordhaus W. Invention, Growth, and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological
Change. MIT Press. Cambridge Mass. 1969.
Ogus A., Veljanovski C.J. Readings in the Economics of Law and Regulation. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. 1984.
Ordover J. A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion. //The Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 1991.Vol. 5. N. 1. P. 43-60.
Ott C.,Schäfer H.-B. Emergence and Construction of Efficient Rules in the Legal System of
German Civil Law. //International Review of Law and Economics. 1993. Vol. 13. N. 3. P. 285-
302.
Parisi F. Positive, Normative and Functional Schools in Law and Economics. // European Journal
of Law and Economics. 2004. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 259-272.
Pitchford R., Snyder Ch. Coming to the Nuisance: An Economic Analysis from an Incomplete
Contracts Perspective. // Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 2003. Vol.19, No.2. P.
491-516.
Penin J. Patents Versus Ex Post Rewards: A New Look. // Research Policy. 2005. Vol. 34 . N.5
P. 641-656.
Plant A. The Economics Aspects of Copyright in Books. // Economica, 1934, Vol. 1,N. 2.
P.167-195.
Plant A. The Economic Theory Concerning Patents for Inventions. // Economica, 1934. Vol 1.
N.1. P. 30-51.
Polinsky M. An Introduction to Law and Economics. Little, Brown and Company. Boston.
and Toronto. 1989.
Polinsky M., Shavell S. Punitive Damages. // P.Newman, The New Palgrave Dictionary of
Economics and the Law, 1998, Vol.III. P.192- 198.
Polinsky M., Shavell S. Some Implications for Optimal Enforcement Policy. // American Law
and Economics Review. 2000. Vol. 2. N. 2 P. 223-237.
Posner E. Contract Remedies: Foreseeability, Precaution, Causation and Mitigation.//
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar. P. 162 -178.
Posner R. The Economics of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983, pp. 88-
115.
Posner R. Economic Analysis of Law: An Essential Tool for Legal Theory and Practice. //
Posner R. Law, Economics and Democracy. Three Lectures in Greece. Athens –Komotini: Ant.
N. Sakkoulas Publishers. 2002.
278
Posner R. The Law and Economics Movement. //The American Economic Review. 1987. Vol.
77. N. 2. P. 1-13.
Posner R. The Learned Hand Formula for Determining Liability. // Tort Law: Cases and
Еconomic Analysis. Boston: Little Brown, 1982, P. 1-9.
Posner R., Rosenfield A. Impossibility and Related Doctrines in Contract Law: An Economic
Analysis. // The Journal of Legal Studies. 1977. Vol. 6. N. 1. P. 83-118.
Priest G.L. The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules. //The Journal of
Legal Studies. 1977.Vol. 6 N. 1. P. 65-82.
Priest G. The Modern Expansion of Tort Liability, Its Sources, Its Effects, and Its Reform. //
The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1991. Vol. 5. N. P. 31-50.
Rasmusen E, Ayres I. Mutual and Unilateral Mistake in Contract Law. // The Journal of Legal
Studies. 1993 Vol. 22. N. 2. P. 309-343.
Rawls J. Social Unity and Primary Goods. // Utilitarianism and Beyond. Ed. by Sen A. and
Williams B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. P. 159-185.
Robbins L. Interpersonal Comparisons of Utilities: A Comment. // Economic Journal. 1938. Vol.
48. N. 192. P. 635-641.
Rose-Ackermann S. Inalienability and the Theory of Property Rights. // Columbia Law Review,
1985. Vol. 85, No. 5. P. 931-969.
Rubin P.H. Why is Common Law Efficient? // The Journal of Legal Studies. 1977. Vol. 6. N. 1
P.51-63.
Schäfer H.-B. Tort Law: General. // Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Cheltenham, UK:
Edward Elgar. P. 569-596.
Schäfer H.-B., Ott C. Lehrbuch der ökonomischen Analyse des Zivilrechtes. Berlin: Springer.
2000.
Schäfer H.-B. The Relevance of Law and Economics for the Development of Judge-Made Rules:
Examples from German Case-law. // European Economic Review. 1996 . Vol. 40. N. 3-5 P.
989-998.
Sen A. The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal. // The Journal of Political Economy. 1970. Vol.
78 . N. 1 P. 152-157.
Sen A. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 2003.
Sen A. The Possibility of Social Choice.// The American Economic Review. 1999. Vol. 89. N. 3.
P. 349 -378.
Sen A. Rationality and Social Choice. //The American Economic Review. 1995. Vol 85. N.1 P.1-
24.
Sen A., Williams B. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002.
279
Schwartz A. The Case for Specific Performance. Yale Law Journal. 1979. Vol. 89. N.2 P.271-
306.
Shavell S. Causation and Tort Liability. // P. Newman, The New Palgrave Dictionary of
Economics and the Law. Macmillan Ref. Lmd. 1998. Vol.1. P.211-214.
Shavell S. Contracts, Holdup, аnd Legal Intervention. // Discussion Paper N. 508. Harvard Law
School, Cambridge, MA. 2005 http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/
Shavell S. The Design of Contracts and Remedies for Breach. The Quarterly Journal of
Economics. 1984.Vol. 99. N. 1. P. 121-148.
Shavell S. Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA,
1987.
Shavell S. The Judgement Proof Problem. // International Review of Law and Economics.
1986. Vol. 6. N. 1. P. 45-58.
Shavell S. Liability for Harm versus Regulation of Safety. // The Journal of Legal Studies. 1984.
Vol.13. N. 2. P.357-374.
Shavell S. A Note on Efficiency vs. Distributional Equity in Legal Rulemaking: Should
Distributional Equity Matter Given Optimal Income Taxation ? //The American Economic
Review. 1981. Vol. 71. N. 2. P. 414-418.
Shavell S. Strict Liability versus Negligence. // The Journal of Legal Studies. 1980. Vol. 9. N. 1
P. 1- 25.
Shavell S.,vanYpersele N. Rewards versus Intellectual Property Rights. // Journal of Law and
Economics. 2001. Vol. 54. N. 4. P.525-547.
Smith J., Smith R. Contract Law, Mutual Mistake, and Incentives to Produce and Disclose
Information. // The Journal of Legal Studies.1990, Vol. 19. N. 2. P. 467-488.
Somin I. Overcoming Poletown: County of Wayne v. Hatchcock, Economic Development
Takings, and the Future of Public Use. // George Mason University Schoool of Law. Law and
Economics Working Paper Series. http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=677763
Stigler G.J. Law or Economics.// Journal of Law and Economics. 1992. Vol. 35. No.2. P. 455-
468.
Sykes A.The Doctrine of Commercial Impracticability in a Second-Best World. //The Journal of
Legal Studies. 1990. Vol 19. N. 1.P. 43-94.
Tirole J. Protection de la Propriete Intellectuelle: Une Introduction et Quelques Pistes de
Reflexion, in Propriete Intellectuelle, report nu.41 de Conseil d’Analyse Economique. La
Documentation Francaise Intellectuelle.
280
Trebilcock M.J. An Economic Approach to the Doctrine of Unconscienability. // Studies in
Contract Law, ed. B.J.Reiter and J. Swan, Toronto: Butterworths.
Trebilcock M. The Role of Insurance Considerationin the Choice of Efficient Civil Liability
Rules.// Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 1988. Vol. 4. N.2. P. 243-265.
Ulen Th. The Efficiency of Specific Performance: Toward a Unified Theory of Contract
Remedies. // Michigan Law Review. 1984. Vol 83. N. P. 341-403.
Van den Bergh R. The Growth of Law and Economics in Europe. //European Economic Review
1996. Vol. 40. N. 3-5. P. 969-977.
Veljanovski C. Wealth Maximization, Law and Ethics – On the Limits of Economic Efficiency.
// International Review of Law and Economics. 1981. Vol. 1. No 1. P. 5-28
Veljanovski C. The Economics of Law: An Introductory Text. London. Institute of Economic
Affairs. 1990.
Veljanovski C. The Economic Approach to Law: A Critical Introduction. // British Journal of
Law and Society.1980. Vol. 7. P. 158
Weisbach D. Should Legal Rules Be Used to Redistribute Income? // The University of Chicago
Law Review. 2003. Vol. 70. N. 1. P. 439 -453.
Zerbe R. O. Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar,
2001.
281