
WOODSTOCK ENCYCLOPEDIA OF POPULAR CULTURE
178
and music. The most common feeling among all parties—producers,
musicians, audience, town, and nation—was the sense of history in
the making. It was the largest group of young people ever gathered,
and the greatest roster of musicians ever assembled, and it became the
defining moment of a generation. Initial media response tended
toward panic, reporting the disastrous aspects of the event. But when
riots failed to flare up, the media recanted, reporting that Woodstock
was a peaceful event, a mass epiphany of good will and communal
sharing. On Sunday, Max Yasgur, the dairy farmer who rented his 600
acres to the festival, took the stage and complimented the crowd,
observing how the festival proved that ‘‘half a million kids can get
together and have three days of fun and music, and have nothing BUT
fun and music.’’ Of course, most of these kids were having a lot more
than that, but the conspicuous absence Yasgur alluded to was vio-
lence. Rock festivals had become increasingly frequent since Monterey
Pop in 1967, and each one was bigger and more riotous than the last.
The assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy
also added a feeling of dread to any large gathering. When Woodstock
promised nothing but disaster, then passed without a single act of
violence, the relief that swept over the watching nation was almost
intoxicating; it seemed like a miracle. The relief among the public and
the evanescent bliss of the kids led to fanatical pronouncements of the
dawning of the Age of Aquarius.
However, many commentators have since claimed that peace
and good will arose not in spite of disaster but because of it. The
hunger, rain, mud, and unserviced toilets conspired to create an
adversity against which people could unite and bond. In ‘‘The
Woodstock Wars,’’ Hal Aspen observed that the communal spirit of
Woodstock was typical of the group psychology of disasters: ‘‘What
takes hold at the time is a humbling sense of togetherness . . . with
those who shared the experience. What takes hold later is a privileged
sense of apartness . . . from those who didn’t.’’ Aspen explained that
the memory of Woodstock led a generation to arrogate ‘‘an epic and
heroic youth culture’’ that subsequent generations could not match.
Those who were once simply called baby boomers now dubbed
themselves ‘‘Woodstock Nation,’’ an independent and enlightened
subculture. Abbie Hoffman wrote a book of editorials called Woodstock
Nation immediately after the event, contrasting the newly united
masses with the ‘‘Pig Nation’’ of mainstream America. He even
contrasted Woodstock with the moon landing of July 20, less than a
month before the festival, calling Woodstock ‘‘the first attempt to
land a man on the earth.’’ The closeness of the two milestone events in
one summer invited such ironic comparisons. Ayn Rand used Nie-
tzsche’s dichotomy of Apollo and Dionysus to contrast the two
events. She observed that the moon landing represented the culmina-
tion of the Apollonian, or civilized, aspect of man, which is governed
by reason, while Woodstock expressed the Dionysian, or primeval,
aspect of man, which is ruled by hedonism. The name of the
moonlanding mission, Apollo, made this interpretation all the more
compelling. But such was the sheer physical magnitude of the
Woodstock Festival that it afforded enough complexity to accommo-
date many interpretations. The moonwalk analogies tended to view
Woodstock as a moment of separation from the establishment, but it
was also possible to view it as reconciliation. It wasn’t just the
audience of hippies who bonded together in the face of disaster.
Community and nation also rushed to their aid. The Red Cross, Girl
Scouts, and Boy Scouts all donated food and supplies to the starving
hoards. Even local townspeople pardoned the havoc wrought upon
their town and made sandwiches for the infiltrators. The youths who
had fled from their parents in pursuit of utopian visions ended up
welcoming assistance from the very establishment that Woodstock
symbolically rejected. They were led to appreciate that these groups
had maintained efficiency to get them out of their jam. Someone, they
realized, had to stay sober. Many Bethel residents, for their part,
commented with surprise on the hippies’ politeness and peaceful
behavior. Mainstream America saw Max Yasgur’s observation born
out, that rock and violence were not inseparable, and that perhaps the
peace the hippies advocated wasn’t such a pipedream after all. In
1972 Woodstock Nation repaid the compliment by nominating Yasgur
for president.
When the initial euphoria wore off it became common to view
Woodstock not as the beginning of a new era but as an ending, the
high-water mark of the 1960s, when hippie freakdom reached critical
mass and dissipated into mainstream, and the establishment coopted
the diluted attitudes and fashions into a commodity. Much of the pride
and idealism of Woodstock Nation crumbled as the following years
brought devastating casualties to their culture. Someone was stabbed
at the Rolling Stones’ free concert at Altamont in December of 1969;
1970 brought the student massacres at Kent Sate University, the
breakup of the Beatles, and the deaths of Jimi Hendrix and Janis
Joplin later that year. The following year, 1971, brought the death of
Jim Morrison, the closing of the Fillmore Concert Halls, and the
reelection of Nixon. Such defeats hastened the trend toward escapism,
exemplified by rock’s detour into country music and apolitical singer/
songwriters, sinking into the quagmire of narcissistic spiritual odysseys
in the ‘‘Me Decade.’’
In the wake of disillusion many claimed that the music was the
most significant aspect of Woodstock, the only legacy successfully
preserved. The documentary, Woodstock: Three Days of Peace and
Music (1970), provided vicarious excitement for the millions who
couldn’t be there, and was enormously popular. It made innovative
use of split-screen techniques to simulate the excitement of a live-
performance, and won an Oscar for Best Documentary. The three-
album soundtrack, Woodstock: Music from the Original Soundtrack
and More, also awoke nostalgia for the swiftly vanishing epoch.
However, the arrangement was jumbled, and many performers were
omitted. A two-album sequel, Woodstock Two, provided more songs
by the artists already favored, but there were still notable absences.
For some people, the albums proved what they felt all along, that the
music was only a minor part of what was really a spiritual event that
couldn’t be captured on vinyl. Janis Joplin and the Grateful Dead,
who seemed to epitomize the youth culture that had sprouted in San
Francisco, reportedly delivered lackluster performances, while then-
unknown acts such as Santana and Joe Cocker proved to be among the
highlights of the festival. A privileged few recall Joan Baez’s per-
formance at the free stage as the highlight. The free stage had been
built outside the festival fence so that those who did not have tickets
could be entertained by amateur bands and open mic. But even after
the festival was declared free and the fence was torn down, the ever-
valiant Joan Baez, surveying the crowd of a half-million people,
perceived that the free stage would still be useful for entertaining
those who could not get close to the main stage, and she played to a
fringe audience for 40 minutes until her manager summoned her to
her scheduled gig at the main stage. This touching moment was not
captured on film or record.
The 25th anniversary of Woodstock in 1994 brought a 4-CD box
set which represented most of the performers and preserved the
chronological order (although many performers, such as Ravi Shankar
and the Incredible String Band, have yet to appear on any Woodstock