
270  Subclass V. DILLENIIDAE
tribes of the Byttnerioideae (Gazet du Chatelier 1940a, b). 
Besides, as Rao (1952) has shown, the structure of the 
androecium is similar for the whole family, and there-
fore there is no reason to separate the Sterculioideae in 
a family of their own.
8. DIEGODENDRACEAE
Capuron 1964. 1/1. Madagascar.
Diegodendron.
According to Capuron (1962, 1970), Hutchinson 
(1969, 1973), Straka and Albers (1978), and Cronquist 
(1980, 1988), the nearest ally of Diegodendraceae is 
the family Ochnaceae. This conclusion is based mainly 
on the gynobasic style, which is evidently the result of 
parallel evolution. The specialized wood anatomy of 
Diegodendron supports a close affi nity with the mal-
valean families, particularly with the Sphaerosepalaceae 
(Dickison 1988). However, according to Nandi (1998), 
Diegodendraceae are closely related to the Bixaceae, 
and Thorne (2006) places them between the Bixaceae 
and Cochlospermaceae.
9. SPHAEROSEPALACEAE
van Tieghem ex Bullock 1959 (Rhopalocarpaceae 
Hemsley 1903). 2/17. Madagascar.
Dialyceras, Rhopalocarpus.
Very closely related to the Diegodendraceae. Both 
of these families exhibit defi nite affi nities to the Sarco-
laenaceae.
10. BOMBACACEAE
Kunth 1822. 29/c.300. Pantropical, especially in rain 
forests of South America, above all in Brazil.
durioneae:  Neesia, Durio, Camptostemon, 
Coeloste gia, Boschia, Kostermansia, Cullenia, 
Scleronema, Cavanillesia;  matisieae:  Quararibea, 
Ochroma, Matisia, Patinoa, Bernoullia, Septotheca, 
Phragmo theca,  Huberodendron;  catostemateae: 
Aguiaria, Catostemma;  bombaceae:  Bombax, 
Eriotheca, Adan sonia, Pseudobombax, Pachira 
(including Rhodog naphalon,  Rhodognaphalopsis, and 
Bombacopsis)  Gyranthera;  ceibeae:  Ceiba, 
Spirotheca, Chorisia, Neobuchia.
Very close to the Malvaceae.
11. MALVACEAE
A.L. de Jussieu 1789 (including Hibiscaceae J.G. Agardh 
1858, Philippodendraceae Endlicher 1841, Plagiantha-
ceae J.G. Agardh 1858). 111/1500–1600. Essentially 
 cosmopolitan, but best developed in the tropics.
kydieae:  Julostylis, Dicellostyles, Nayariophyton, 
Kydia;  hibisceae:  Decaschistia, Radyera, Hibiscus, 
Papuodendron, Talipariti, Kosteletzkya, Fioria, 
Wercklea, Abelmoschus, Hibiscadelphus, Senra, 
Symphyochlamys, Megistostegium, Perrierophytum, 
Humbertiella, Macrostelia, Helicteropsis, Humber-
tianthus, Cenocentrum, Lagunaria, Urena, Malachra, 
Peltaea, Phragmocarpidium, Rojasimalva (includ-
ing  Lopimia),  Pavonia, Malvaviscus, Anotea; 
gossypieae: Cienfuegosia, Cephalohibiscus, Lebron necia, 
Hampea, Thespesia, Gossypioides, Kokia, Gossypium, 
Alyogyne;  malveae:  Anoda, Periptera, Horsfordia, 
Bakeridesia, Bastardiastrum, Wissadula, Tetrasida, 
Pseudabutilon, Bastardia, Bastardiopsis, Abutilon, 
Herissantia, Neobaclea, Meximalva, Corynabutilon, 
Briquetia, Hochreutinera, Dirhamphis, Gaya, 
Billieturnera, Sidastrum, Sida, Krapovickasia, 
Rhynchosida, Robinsonella, Dendrosida, Fryxellia, 
Allowissadula, Allosidastrum, Neobrittonia, Batesi-
malva, Malvella, Lecanophora, Cristaria, Astero-
trichion, Plagianthus, Gynatrix, Hoheria, Lawrencia, 
Sidasodes, Sidalcea, Eremalche, Iliamna, Malvastrum, 
Modiolastrum, Modiola, Calyculogygas, Callirhoe, 
Calyptraemalva, Napaea, Monteiroa, Lavatera, Malva, 
Althaea, Navaea, Malope, Malacothamnus, Phymosia, 
Alcea, Kitaibelia, Anisodontea, Kearnemalvastrum, 
Acaulimalva, Urocarpidium, Fuertesimalva, Palaua, 
Nototriche, Tarasa, Sphaeralcea, Andeimalva.
Malvaceae are so closely related to the Bomba-
caceae, that from time to time the proposal arises to 
merge these two families. Edlin (1935) transferred 
the tribe Hibisceae together with the genus Kydia to 
the Bombacaceae, but as Hutchinson (1967: 538) 
noted, “Malvaceae without the great genus Hibiscus 
would be like a horse without a tail.” The most 
archaic tribe is Malopeae, in which the carpels are in 
two or more superposed and spirally arranged cycles. 
All other tribes have carpels in a single cycle. 
The tribe Ureneae, probably the most advanced, has 
twice as many style branches as carpels, which may 
be due to a splitting of the styles, just as the anthers 
are split and unilocular in the whole family 
(Hutchinson 1967: 538).