
Proceedings of ISES Solar World Congress 2007: Solar Energy and Human Settlement
530
The thermal efficiency of the collectors was previously
determined in 2001 or 2002 respectively in new state.
Hence the characteristic collector efficiency parameters for
the new collectors are known. Afterwards the collectors
have been exposed outdoors for a 3 year period to normal
weather conditions. During that time the collectors were
not filled with a heat transfer fluid. Therefore the
conditions were similar to the operating state “stagnation”
where no usable heat is removed from the collector and
hence very high absorber temperatures are reached. After
the exposure the thermal performance of the collectors was
determined again in 2005. Like the performance tests of the
collectors in new state, this was done by an outdoor test
according to European Standard EN 12975-2 using the
quasi-dynamic test method for the determination of the
characteristic collector efficiency parameters.
This paper presents a comparison of the characteristic
collector efficiency parameters (η
0
, a
1
, a
2
) for the new and
the exposed (aged) collectors. Furthermore, it will be
shown how the changes in the collector efficiency
parameters due to ageing will influence the yearly energy
gain and the fractional energy savings of a typical solar
domestic hot water system.
2. IMPACT OF EXPOSURE ON CHARACTERISTIC
COLLECTOR EFFICIENCY PARAMETERS
In the following the changes of the collector efficiency
parameters due to the 3 years exposure will be presented
and discussed. The resulting changes of the conversion
factor η
0
and the effective heat transfer coefficients of the
15 solar thermal collectors are presented. For a better
assessment of the exposure impact on the heat transfer
coefficients a
1
and a
2
, the effective heat transfer coefficient
a
eff
(50K) at a temperature difference ΔT of 50 K (between
average fluid temperature and ambient temperature) was
determined according to equation 1.
(50 ) 50aKaaTwithTK=+⋅Δ Δ=
(1)
2.1 Conversion Factor
Figure 1 shows the conversion factors η
0
of the 15
collectors in new state and after the exposure. Nearly all of
the collectors show a slight decrease of the conversion
factor.
η
[-]
Fig. 1: Conversion factors η
0
of the 15 tested collectors in
new state and after the exposure.
As the conversion factor is mainly dependent on the
transmittance-absorbance product, the decrease does not
necessarily result from a reduction in absorbance of the
selective coating, but also possibly from a reduction of
transmittance of the transparent collector cover. Former
investigations /1/ show that dust deposits on the cover are
often the reason for a lower transmittance and that this
problem can be solved with a thorough cleaning of the
collector cover. During the exposure no special cleaning
had taken place but deposits on the collector cover were
partly removed by natural rain. Prior to the thermal
efficiency tests the collectors were washed off. However, a
special cleaning with cleaning agents, as it was done in the
above mentioned investigation, was not carried out.
The comparison of the conversion factors in new state and
after the exposure results in an average reduction of the
conversion factor of -2.6 % (absolute). The entire range of
the absolute change comprises +0.5 to -4.5 %. From the
group of flat plate collectors, collector no. 7 shows the
smallest reduction of -1.8 % (absolute). The evacuated tube
collectors 14 and 15 show only very slight changes in the
conversion factors. Collector no. 15 with its absolute
reduction of 0.9 % is clearly under the average of -2.6 %.
Regarding collector no. 14 a slight increase of the
conversion factor of +0.5 % can be observed, which is
however within the limits of the measurement accuracy.
2.2 Effective Heat Transfer Coefficient
As can be seen in Figure 2, all collectors show only very
small changes in the effective heat transfer coefficients
a
eff
(50 K).