9-134 The Civil Engineering Handbook, Second Edition
a = the ratio of the mass transfer coefficient under conditions in the aeration tank to the mass
transfer coefficient under standard conditions (dimensionless)
b = the ratio of the oxygen solubility for the salinity in the aeration tank to the oxygen solubility
in pure water (dimensionless)
The alpha and beta values depend on water composition, and alpha also depends on the aeration
equipment. They should be determined by field testing.
Beta is generally near 1, unless the salinity of the water is high. The effect is accounted for by Eq. (9.315)
and Table 9.16. And, if oxygen solubilities are calculated from Eq. (9.315), beta should be set to unity.
Some aeration field data are given in Table 9.21 (Joint Task Force, 1988). For diffused air and oxygen
systems, the alpha value for raw and settled municipal wastewater is about 0.2 to 0.3; it rises to about
0.5 to 0.6 for conventional, unnitrified effluents and to about 0.8 to 0.9 for highly treated, nitrified
effluents. Alpha values for fine bubble diffusers are smaller than those for coarse bubble systems. For
surface aeration systems, the alpha value for raw and settled municipal wastewater is about 0.6; it may
rise to 1.2 for clean water.
The volumetric mass transfer coefficient is temperature dependent (Stenstrom and Gilbert, 1981):
(9.342)
where T
0
= the reference temperature in °C
T
1
= the aeration tank temperature in °C.
The usual reference temperature is 20°C.
The so-called “standard oxygen transfer rate” (SOTR) of equipment is usually reported under standard
conditions of clean water, zero dissolved oxygen, 20°C, 1 standard atmosphere (101.325 kPa or 2116.22 lbf/ft
2
)
of ambient air pressure, and a specified depth of submergence. The SOTR is calculated as,
(9.343)
TA BLE 9.21 Observed and Standard Oxygen Transfer Efficiencies at Selected Wastewater Treatment Plants
Location System
Observed
Tr ansfer
Efficiency
(%)
Average
Alpha
Va lu e
Range of
Alpha Values
Expected
Efficiency
under
Standard
Conditions
(%)
Madison, WI Ceramic grid, step feed 17.8 0.64 0.42–0.98 25–37
Whittier Narrows, CA Ceramic grid, plug flow 11.2 0.45 0.35–0.60 25–37
Seymour, WI Ceramic grid, plug flow 16.5 0.66 0.49–0.75 25–37
Lakewood, OH Ceramic grid, plug flow 14.5 0.51 0.44–0.57 25–37
Lakewood, OH Ceramic grid, plug flow 8.9 0.31 0.26–0.37 25–37
Madison, WI Ceramic and plastic tubes, step feed 11.0 0.62 0.46–0.85 13–32
Madison, WI Wide-band, fixed orifice nonporous
diffusers, step feed
10.0 1.07 0.83–1.19 9–13
Orlando, FL Wide-band, fixed orifice, nonporous
diffusers, complete mix
7.6 0.75 0.67–0.83 9–13
Nassau Co., NY Flexible membrane tubes, plug flow 7.6 0.36 0.27–0.42 15–29
Whittier Narrows, CA Jet aerators, plug flow 9.4 0.58 0.48–0.72 15–24
Brandon, WI Jet aerators, complete mix 10.9 0.45 0.40–0.50 15–24
Brandon, WI Jet aerators, complete mix 7.5 0.47 0.46–0.48 15–24
Source: Joint Task Force of the Water Pollution Control Federation and the American Society of Civil Engineers. 1988.
Aeration: A Wastewater Treatment Process, WPCF Manual of Practice No. FD-13, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering
Practice No. 68. Water Pollution Control Federation, Alexandria, VA; American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
KaT
KaT
o
TT
o
l
l
1
1 024
1
()
()
=
-
.
RKaCV
std s
= ◊◊
l