
THE EQO INDUSTRY 355
The method of preserving eggs by packing them in water glass has
been successfully used for many years. The water glass sterilizes the
surface of the egg and hermetically seals the egg so that bacteria
cannot reach the interior of the egg.
Some other sealing methods have been employed in egg preservation
as wrapping eggs in waxed paper, coating with paraffin, varnishing
with collodion, etc., and coating with vaseline.
Of the methods tried out the use of a vaseline coating, packing in
lime water or water glass were the only ones which caused eggs to
remain unfermented according to the U. S. Dept. of Agriculture.
The use of vaseline was found to be too laborious and storage in
brae water gave a slight taste of lime water. It was found that the
use of water glass (solution of water glass in water 1:9) was most
efficient and practical; especially where a fairly low temperature of
storage is maintained and eggs are kept well covered with the solution.
The most satisfactory results are obtained when on]y the cleanest
eggs are used. Eggs which have been washed do not store well because
in washing the bacteria on the surface of the egg are carried into the
egg pores and readily find entrance into the egg. Eggs which are
cracked or have spots should also be eliminated as they have internal
contamination. Such eggs can be identified by candling. Infertile
eggs are better for storage than fertile ones.
REFERENCES ON EGG INDUSTRY.
Beckwith, T. D., and Hortoij, G. D., 1914. Is the poor hatching of normal eggs
due to the presence of microorganisms -within the egg? Science, N. S.. Vol.
40,
p. 240.
Bushnell, L. D., and Mauer, 0., 1914. Some factors influencing the bacterial con-
tent and keeping quality of eggs. Elan, Agr. Expt. Sta., Bui. 201.
Cao,
G., 1908. Su La Penneobilita della uova ai microorganismi ann. Inst.
lg.
Sper. Univ. Roma, Vol. 18, p. 39.
Ciuoa, M., 1908. Sur la culture du streptocoque dans les ouefs de poulea vac-
oine'ea contre ce microbe. Compt. Rendu. Soo. Biol. Paris, Vol. 86, p. 275.
Gage, G. E., 1911. Note on ovarian infection With Bact. pullorum
•
(Rettger)
in the domestic foul. Jour. Medical Research, Vol. 24. p. 491.
Hadley, Philip B., and Caldwell, Dorothy W., 1916. The bacterial infection
of fresh eggs. Rhode Island Agr. Exp. Sta., Bulletin No. 164, pp. 1-70.
Lameon, G. EL Jr., 1909. Infection and preservation of eggs. Storrs Agr.
Exp.
Sta., Bui. 66.
Mauer, O., 1911. Bacteriological study on eggs.
TTRTI
Agr. Expt. Sta., Bui.
180.
Pennington, Mary E., et al., 1914. A bacteriological and chemical study of com-
mercial eggs in the producing districts pf the Central West. U. S. Dept. of
Agr., Bur. Chem., Bui. 51.
Pennington, M. E., and Robertson, H. C, Jr., 1912. A study of the enzymes
of the egg of the common fowl. U. S. Dept. Agr, Bur. of Chemistry, Cir-
cular 104.
Pennington, M. E., et al., 1916. A study of the preparation of frozen and dried
eggs in the producing section. U. 8. D. A., Professional Paper No. 224.
Pennington, M. E., Jenkins, M. K., and Betta, H. M. P., 1918. How to candle
eggs.
U. S. D. A., Bui. 665.
Pemot, E. F., 1908. An investigation of the mortality of incubator chioka.
Oregon Expt. Sta., Bui. 103.