
312 
Greg King and Ian Stewart 
This is precisely what Fenstermacher 
et 
al. 
[15] 
have observed in 
turbulent Taylor vortex flow. 
Indeed  more  may  be  true. 
Experiments  in  Swinney’s  labora: 
tory  (communicated  to us by  Dan  Lathrop) suggest that the 
entire 
sequence of  symmetry-breaking bifurcations  from  Couette 
flow 
to 
modulated  wavy  vortices may  be  restored  in 
a 
corresponding series 
of 
crises 
(or 
similar transitions) of  chaotic attractors. 
The symmetry-increasing crisis model shows that the most puz- 
zling aspect of  the formation of  turbulent Taylor vortices 
- 
the in- 
crease in pattern 
as 
the turbulence becomes stronger 
- 
is actually 
natural.  Only  by  growing in  size can  strange attractors  collide  to 
combine their symmetries. 
There are strong analogies between this scenario, the bifurcations 
of  the cubic logistic map, and those  of  the Van  der Pol-Duffing 
os- 
cillator reported  above.  The general changes in symmetry, and the 
changes from  order 
to 
chaos,  are essentially identical  in  all  three. 
The differences lie in the fine detail 
of 
the dynamics. 
It would  be interesting to test  this idea.  It does not  appear 
fea- 
sible to do 
so 
by  way  of  numerical  simulations:  we  are looking at 
a 
turbulent  time-dependent three-dimensional flow,  beyond the ca- 
pabilities even of 
a 
supercomputer.  However, it should be relatively 
easy 
to 
test  it  experimentally,  by  using 
a 
22-equivariant  time  se- 
ries.  The natural  way  to achieve this  is  to use  two  laser  probes, 
symmetrically placed above and below the ‘boundary’ between adja- 
cent turbulent Taylor vortices, arranged 
to 
measure the 
axial 
velocity 
(or 
some velocity with 
a 
strong axial component).  Indeed two beams 
could be produced from 
a 
single laser using 
a 
beam-splitter; however, 
two detectors might be necessary.  The signals could be processed by 
an equivariant version of  the method of  Broomhead and King 
[6], 
as 
described above. 
Acknowledgements 
We  are grateful 
to 
Peter  Ashwin,  Sofia Castro,  Mike  Field,  Marty 
Golubitksy,  Gabriela  Gomes,  Maciej  Krupa,  Dan  Lathrop,  Robert 
MacKay,  and  Mark  Roberts for  permission  to include unpublished 
ideas of  theirs and to describe work  in progress, and 
for 
helpful dis-