
316 • Introduction to Integration
hour, where the distance traveled is 60 × 1 = 60 miles—the same as the area
under the right-hand rectangle. The total distance traveled is again 100 miles.
The important thing to note is that we broke up the journey into pieces of
time where the car was going at a constant speed, found the distance traveled
for each piece, and then added them all up. Using a formula like d = v
av
× t
is no good on the whole journey unless you know the average speed. Wait,
you say—the average speed here is obviously 50 mph, so there’s no problem!
OK, that’s true, but let’s look at the third car and then see if you still feel
the same way.
The third car travels at 20 mph for the first 15 minutes, then goes 40 mph
until 4 p.m. At that time, it switches to 60 mph for half an hour, before
shifting to the slower speed of 50 mph for the rest of the journey. Once again
ignoring the short accelerations and decelerations when the speed changes,
the graph of v against t looks like this:
PSfrag
replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shado
w
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror
(y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y =
(x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same
height
−
x
Same
length,
opp
osite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y =
2
x
y =
10
x
y =
2
−x
y =
log
2
(x)
4
3
units
mirror
(x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
=
0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opp
osite
adjacen
t
0
(≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
I
I
I
II
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference
angle
reference
angle =
π
6
sin
+
sin −
cos
+
cos −
tan
+
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this
angle is
5π
6
clo
ckwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y =
sin(x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y =
sin(x)
y =
cos(x)
−
π
2
π
2
y =
tan(x), −
π
2
<
x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y =
tan(x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y =
sec(x)
y =
csc(x)
y =
cot(x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y =
tan
−1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin
(x)
x
,
x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 <
x < 0.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f(
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x +
2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f (t))
(
u, f (u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f (x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangen
t at x = a
b
tangen
t at x = b
c
tangen
t at x = c
y = x
2
tangen
t
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u +
∆u
v +
∆v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆
u
∆
v
u
∆v
v∆
u
∆
u∆v
y = f(
x)
1
2
−
2
y = |
x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −
2x + 5
y = g(
x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
y = f (
x)
3
−
3
3
−
3
0
−
1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(
x)
3
−
3
0
−
1
2
1
−
1
y =
sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(
x)
tan(
x)
y =
sin
(x)
x
π
2
π
1
−
1
x =
0
a =
0
x
> 0
a
> 0
x
< 0
a
< 0
rest
position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(
x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(
x) = b
x
y = e
x
5
10
1
2
3
4
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
y =
ln(x)
y =
cosh(x)
y =
sinh(x)
y =
tanh(x)
y =
sech(x)
y =
csch(x)
y =
coth(x)
1
−
1
y = f(
x)
original
function
in
verse function
slop
e = 0 at (x, y)
slop
e is infinite at (y, x)
−
108
2
5
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y =
sin(x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y =
sin(x)
y =
sin(x), −
π
2
≤ x ≤
π
2
−
2
−
1
0
2
π
2
−
π
2
y =
sin
−1
(x)
y =
cos(x)
π
π
2
y =
cos
−1
(x)
−
π
2
1
x
α
β
y =
tan(x)
y =
tan(x)
1
y =
tan
−1
(x)
y =
sec(x)
y =
sec
−1
(x)
y =
csc
−1
(x)
y =
cot
−1
(x)
1
y =
cosh
−1
(x)
y =
sinh
−1
(x)
y =
tanh
−1
(x)
y =
sech
−1
(x)
y =
csch
−1
(x)
y =
coth
−1
(x)
(0
, 3)
(2
, −1)
(5
, 2)
(7
, 0)
(
−1, 44)
(0
, 1)
(1
, −12)
(2
, 305)
y =
1
2
(2
, 3)
y = f(
x)
y = g(
x)
a
b
c
a
b
c
s
c
0
c
1
(
a, f (a))
(
b, f (b))
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y =
sin(x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
c
OR
Lo
cal maximum
Lo
cal minimum
Horizon
tal point of inflection
1
e
y = f
0
(
x)
y = f (
x) = x ln(x)
−
1
e
?
y = f(
x) = x
3
y = g(
x) = x
4
x
f(
x)
−
3
−
2
−
1
0
1
2
1
2
3
4
+
−
?
1
5
6
3
f
0
(
x)
2 −
1
2
√
6
2
+
1
2
√
6
f
00
(
x)
7
8
g
00
(
x)
f
00
(
x)
0
y =
(
x − 3)(x − 1)
2
x
3
(
x + 2)
y = x ln
(x)
1
e
−
1
e
5
−
108
2
α
β
2 −
1
2
√
6
2
+
1
2
√
6
y = x
2
(
x − 5)
3
−
e
−
1/2
√
3
e
−
1/2
√
3
−
e
−3/2
e
−3/2
−
1
√
3
1
√
3
−1
1
y = xe
−3x
2
/2
y =
x
3
− 6x
2
+ 13x − 8
x
28
2
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
−100
−200
−300
−400
−500
−600
0
10
−10
5
−5
20
−20
15
−15
0
4
5
6
x
P
0
(x)
+
−
−
existing fence
new fence
enclosure
A
h
b
H
99
100
101
h
dA/dh
r
h
1
2
7
shallow
deep
LAND
SEA
N
y
z
s
t
3
11
9
L(11)
√
11
y = L(x)
y = f (x)
11
y = L(x)
y = f(x)
F
P
a
a + ∆x
f(a + ∆x)
L(a + ∆x)
f(a)
error
df
∆x
a
b
y = f(x)
true zero
starting approximation
better approximation
v
t
3
5
5
50
40
60
4
20
3030 25
The average speed isn’t obvious from looking at the graph. On the other
hand, we can work out the distance by breaking the 2-hour time interval into
smaller pieces corresponding to the four rectangles in the above graph:
• From 3 to 3.25 (which is the way to write 3:15 p.m. in decimal hours),
the car traveled at 20 mph, so the distance traveled was 20 × 0.25 = 5
miles. That’s the area of the first rectangle above, since its height is
20 mph and its base is 0.25 hours.
• From 3.25 to 4, the speed was 40 mph, so the distance was 40 ×0.75, or
30 miles. That’s the area of the second rectangle.
• From 4 to 4.5 (that is, 4:30 p.m.), the car’s speed was 60 mph, so the
distance was 60 × 0.5 = 30 miles—the area of the third rectangle.
• Finally, from 4.5 to 5, the speed was 50 mph, so the distance traveled
during that time was 50×0.5 = 25 miles, precisely the area of the fourth
rectangle.
So, during the four time periods, the car went 5, 30, 30, and 25 miles, respec-
tively, as shown on the above graph; the total is therefore 5+30+30+25 = 90
miles. Finally, we’ve found the distance the third car traveled! This means
that its average speed was actually 90/2 = 45 mph, which isn’t even one of
the four speeds that the car went at. (This doesn’t violate the Mean Value
Theorem because the function in the above graph isn’t differentiable.)