
estates. Consider the financial aspects of grouse
shooting in Britain. The red grouse is a wild game
bird restricted to the heather moorlands of the British
Isles; numbers are not supplemented through rearing
or releasing but are increased through the care of the
heather habitat and the control of harmful predators
and parasites. The revenue generated from the letting
of grouse shooting depends on the type of shooting
undertaken. Driven shooting, where a group of 16
people drive the grouse to a line of 8–10 people
standing with guns, can only occur when August
grouse densities are sufficiently high and usually
only when they exceed 60 birds per square kilometer.
During 1991, driven grouse shooting was let at £70
per brace (one brace ¼ two birds) and daily grouse
bags of up to 500 and 650 brace per day were
recorded. However, this level of harvesting is unusual
and a productive day’s driven grouse shooting is nor-
mally in the region of 100 brace per day. Even so, a
day’s let grouse shooting which generates £7000 gross
per day forms an important source of financial return
for upland estates which would otherwise have to
depend on poor returns from sheep farming or com-
mercial afforestation.
0004 The sale of the game from these commercial shoots is
an insignificant return. During 1991, old grouse were
selling at £1 per brace and young grouse at £3.50 per
brace, which amounted to approximately 5% of gross
margin. Traditionally, each sportsman receives a brace
of birds at the end of a day’sshootingandtheremainder
are sold to game dealers who export the meat as a
delicacy to continental Europe.
0005 The revenue gathered from game shooting can be
significant; within Scotland, the direct and indirect
revenue of grouse shooting alone in 1989 generated
a total of £10.3 million to the Scottish gross domestic
product and created the equivalent of 2323 full-time
jobs. These jobs were often in remote rural areas in
which alternative opportunities were limited.
0006 The financial returns from birds reared and
released provide a much lower net return since the
costs of rearing and subsequently feeding are high. In
1991, pheasant rearing costs almost equalled the £15
per bird return at which pheasant shooting is let.
Once again the carcass value is low, at only £1 per
bird or 7% of the gross margin.
0007 In contrast to the British system, North American
hunters have free access to vast areas of land and the
game that it may contain and generally must purchase
a license to take a limited number of game. Conse-
quently the shooting season is shorter, but more
intense, with a limited annual bag for each quarry
species. Financially the system is designed so that the
money generated from licenses and from taxes on
guns and sporting equipment is used to finance the
state Fish and Wildlife Services. Unlike the British
intensive system of game production, the American
system provides an incentive for a larger proportion
of the population to be involved in the sport and have
access to the game as a source of food.
Harvesting Strategies
0008The objective of most harvesting strategies is to pro-
duce the maximum long-term yield of game from a
population (known as the maximum sustainable yield
or MSY), be it for economic revenue, quantity of food
produced, or even the esthetic benefits arising from
the conservation of the game bird resource. The size
of the MSY that can be obtained from a population
can be estimated through mathematical models using
a number of approaches.
0009The simplest is to consider a population that in-
creases according to a logistic growth curve where the
per capita rate of increase falls linearly as the popula-
tion rises; when this reaches zero the population has
reached its carrying capacity. Harvesting this popula-
tion will result in the size of the population falling to a
level where the harvesting rate is equal to the popula-
tion growth rate. The MSY is reached when the
harvest rate equals the maximum growth rate of
the population, and for the logistic model this is
when the density is at half the carrying capacity.
Higher harvesting rates will result in the final
extinction of the population, whereas lower harvest-
ing rates allow the population to rise until harvesting
rate equals the growth rate of the population.
0010For any regulated population it is important to
realize that any sustainable yield, including the
MSY, lies at a level below the carrying capacity of
the environment. This point is rarely appreciated by
managers of wild animal populations or even by
many biologists who are frequently concerned with
keepering a breeding population as high as possible
in the misplaced belief that this will increase the
quantity of the resource available for harvesting.
MSYs have been estimated for a number of game
bird populations; for example, MSY for bobwhite
quail is 55% of the autumn population, which re-
duces the size of the population to 72% of the unhar-
vested state. For gray partridges the MSY is about
37%, mallard 29%, and pheasants 20% of the female
population. For other species MSYs may not be easily
calculated since numbers may fluctuate greatly and
the optimal solution may depend on whether the
population is increasing or decreasing.
0011The release of reared birds provides a supplement
to the wild population but may result in overhar-
vesting of the wild population and in the long term
the loss of a wild breeding population. For example,
2852 GAME/Birds