
trial cities such as Liverpool, Manchester and Glasgow. In some instances, the
initiative came from businessmen, as in the case of Henry Simon, an ex-German
émigré who marked a successful business career in his adopted city with financial
support to several cultural institutions and the endowment of a physics labora-
tory at Manchester Owens College in to be orientated towards local indus-
try on the European Polytechnic model.
77
Elsewhere, the initiative was
dependent on the efforts of individual scientists who built up alliances with local
business and provided consultancy and other research services, as in the case of
Henry Roscoe, chemist, and Hans Reynold, engineer, at Manchester.
78
The
institutional cement binding the representatives of these groups was provided by
the local branches of professional societies such as the Society of the Chemical
Industry and the Society of Engineers and Metallurgists. The formation of a
Department of Industrial Chemistry at Liverpool in was a late manifesta-
tion of this local conjunction of scientists and industrialists.
79
However, trends
in corporate organisation previously mentioned, along with the growth in
central funding for industrial and scientific research and the status ambitions of
the provincial universities, all contributed to weakening these alliances.
Individual business endowments still continued as in the case of the Leicester
businessmen who founded the University College in , or of Jesse Boot, who
refounded University College in Nottingham in .
80
Otherwise, the general
trend was for the local connections between business and higher education, espe-
cially scientific education, to become less significant both to the larger compa-
nies and to university scientists themselves.
By contrast, the importance of technical education in the local economy
was enhanced as the former dominance of Britain’s major industrial interests
came under ever greater foreign competition after , and as wartime casual-
ties and post-war labour shortages encouraged mechanisation and the further
Industrialisation and the city economy
77
B. Simon, Henry Simon of Manchester: In Search of a Grandfather, Henry Simon (–) (Leicester,
).
78
For critical assessments of the impact of these local initiatives on the supply of scientific man-
power, See Roderick and Stephens, Education and Industry, pp. –, and, more recently,
A. Guagnini, ‘The fashioning of higher technical education in Britain: the case of Manchester,
–’, in Gospel, ed., Industrial Training, pp. –. See also M. Sanderson, The Universities
and British Industry – (London, ); M. Sanderson, ‘The professor as industrial consul-
tant: Oliver Arnold and the British steel industry, –’, Ec.HR, nd series, (),
–; G. Tweedale, ‘Science, innovation and the “rule of thumb”: the development of British
metallurgy to ’, in J. Liebenau, ed., The Challenge of New Technology (Aldershot, ), pp.
–; J. Butt, John Anderson’s Legacy:The University of Strathclyde and its Antecedents – (East
Linton, ), shows the wide-ranging interconnections between science, industry, and aca-
demic research. See also D. Edgerton, Science,Technology and British Industrial ‘Decline’, –
(Cambridge, ), for an overview.
79
S. M. Horrocks, ‘Academic and scientific elites in Liverpool in the late th and th centuries’
(paper presented to the Centre for Urban History seminar, ). We are grateful to Sally
Horrocks for this information and other references.
80
B. Burch, The University of Leicester:A History – (Leicester, ).
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008