"The painter who strives to repre-
sent reality must transcend his own
perception. He must ignore or
override the very mechanisms in
his mind that create objects out of
images.... The artist, like the eye,
must provide true images and the
clues of distance to tell his magic
lies."
— Colin Blakemore
Mechanics of the Mind, 1977
From childhood onward, we have
learned to see things in terms of
words: We name things, and we
know facts about them. The domi-
nant left verbal system doesn't
want too much information about
things it perceives—just enough to
recognize and to categorize. It
seems that one of its functions is to
screen out a large proportion of
contextual perceptions. This is a
necessary process and one that
works very well for us most of the
time, enabling us to focus our
attention. The left brain, in this
sense, learns to take a quick look
and says, "Right, that's a chair (or
an umbrella, bird, tree, dog, etc.)."
But drawing requires that you
look at something for a long time,
perceiving lots of details and
how they fit together, registering
as much information as possible—
ideally, everything, as Albrecht
Dürer apparently tried to do in
Figure 5-19.
If verbal knowledge of the cube's real shape overwhelms the
student's purely visual perception, "incorrect" drawing results—
drawing with the kinds of problems that make adolescents
despair (see Figure 5-17). Knowing that cubes have square cor-
ners, students usually start a drawing of a cube with a square cor-
ner. Knowing that a cube rests on a flat surface, students draw
straight lines across the bottom. Their errors compound them-
selves as the drawing proceeds, and the students become more
and more confused.
Though a sophisticated viewer, familiar with the art of
cubism and abstraction, might find the "incorrect" drawings in
Figure 5-17 more interesting than the "correct" drawings in Fig-
ure 5-18, young students find praise of their wrong forms incom-
prehensible. In this case, the child's intent was to make the cube
look "real." Therefore, to the child, the drawing is a failure. To
say otherwise seems as absurd to students as telling them that
"two plus two equals five" is a creative and praiseworthy solution.
On the basis of "incorrect" drawings such as the cube draw-
ings, students may decide that they "can't draw." But they can
draw; that is, the forms indicate that manually they are perfectly
able to draw. The dilemma is that previously stored knowledge—
which is useful in other contexts—prevents their seeing the
thing-as-it-is, right there in front of their eyes.
Sometimes the teacher solves the problem by showing the
students how—that is, by demonstrating the process of drawing.
Learning by demonstration is a time-honored method of teach-
ing art, and it works if the teacher can draw well and has con-
fidence enough to demonstrate realistic drawing in front of a
class. Unfortunately, most teachers at the crucial elementary
level are themselves not trained in perceptual skills in drawing.
Therefore, teachers often have the same feelings of inadequacy
concerning their own ability to draw realistically as the children
they wish to teach.
Many teachers wish children at this age would be freer, less
concerned about realism in their artwork. But however much
some teachers may deplore their students' insistence on realism,
the children themselves are relentless. They will have realism, or
80
THE NEW DRAWING ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE BRAIN