See also Beads; Feathers; Sewing Machine; Spangles; Trim-
mings.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Embroidery. London: The Embroiderers’ Guild. An informed
periodical with articles on historic, ethnographic, and con-
temporary embroidery, exhibition, and book reviews.
The Essential Guide to Embroidery. London: Murdoch Books,
2002.
Gostelow, Mary. Embroidery: Traditional Designs, Techniques and
Patterns from All Over the World. London: Marshall
Cavendish Books Ltd., 1982. Useful for a cross-cultural
perspective of embroidery.
Harbeson, Georgiana Brown. American Needlework: The History
of Decorative Stitchery and Embroidery from the Late 16th to
the 20th Century. New York: Coward McCann, Inc., 1938.
Krody, Sumru Belger. Flowers of Silk and Gold; Four Centuries of
Ottoman Embroidery. London: Merrell Publishers Ltd., in
association with The Textile Museum, Washington, D.C.,
2000. Excellent discussion of a major embroidery tradition
within its cultural context. Well-illustrated with close-up
details, and glossary of stitches.
O’Neill, Tania Diakiw. Ukrainian Embroidery Techniques. Moun-
taintop, Pa.: STO Publications, 1984.
Parker, Rozsika. The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Mak-
ing of the Feminine. New York: Routledge, 1984. Insight
into the sometimes overlooked role of women as profes-
sional embroiderers and discussion of embroidery and the
construction of femininity.
Swain, Margaret. Scottish Embroidery: Medieval to Modern. Lon-
don: B. T. Batsford, Ltd., 1986. Useful discussion on meth-
ods of production and the role of embroidery as a
commercial and domestic activity.
Swan, Susan Burrows. Plain and Fancy: American Women and
their Needlework, 1650–1850. Rev. ed. Austin, Tex.: Curi-
ous Works Press, 1995.
Swift, Gay. The Batsford Encyclopaedia of Embroidery Techniques.
London: B. T. Batsford, Ltd., 1984. A comprehensive guide
to techniques and their applications to historic clothing.
Synge, Lanto. Art of Embroidery: History of Style and Technique.
Woodbridge, U.K.: Antique Collectors’ Club, 2001.
Lindsay Shen and Marilee DesLauriers
EMPIRE STYLE In its broadest sense as a term in
contemporary fashion, “empire style” (sometimes called
simply “Empire” with the French pronunciation, “om-
peer”) refers to a woman’s dress silhouette in which the
waistline is considerably raised above the natural level,
and the skirt is usually slim and columnar. The reference
is to fashions of France’s First Empire, which in politi-
cal terms lasted from 1804 when Napoleon Bonaparte
crowned himself Emperor, to his final defeat at the Bat-
tle of Waterloo in 1815. It should be noted that the styles
of this period, when referring specifically to English or
American fashions or examples, may be termed “Re-
gency” (referring to the Regency of the Prince of Wales,
1811–1820) or “Federal” (referring to the decades im-
mediately following the American Revolution).
None of these terms, whose boundaries are defined
by political milestones, accurately encompasses the time
frame in which “empire style” fashions are found, which
date from the late 1790s to about 1820, after which skirts
widened and the waistline lowered to an extent no longer
identifiable as “empire style.”
The Empire style in its purest form is characterized
by: the columnar silhouette—without gathers in front,
some fullness over the hips, and a concentration of gath-
ers aligned with the 3–4” wide center back bodice panel;
a raised waistline, which at its extreme could be at armpit-
level, dependent on new forms of corsetry with small bust
gussets, cording under the breasts, and shoulder straps to
keep the bust high; soft materials, especially imported In-
dian white muslin (the softest, sheerest of which is called
“mull”), often pre-embroidered with white cotton thread;
and neoclassical influence in overall style (the silhouette
imitating Classical statuary) and in accessories and trim.
Neoclassical references included sandals; bonnets,
hairstyles, and headdresses copied from Greek statues and
vases; and motifs found in ancient architecture and dec-
orative arts, such as the Greek key, and oak and laurel
leaves. The use of purely neoclassical references was at
its peak from about 1798 to just after 1800; after that,
they were succeeded by other influences.
The adoption of these references has been linked
with France’s Revolution and adoption of Greek and Ro-
man democratic and republican principles, and certainly
the French consciously sought to make these connections
both at the height of their Revolution, and under
Napoleon, who was eager to link himself to the great Ro-
man emperors.
Applying this political reference to America is more
problematic. The extremely revealing versions of the
style were seldom seen in America, where conservatism
and ambivalence about letting Europe dictate American
fashions ran deep. However, Americans did adopt the
general look of the period, and plenty of dresses survive
to testify that fashionable young women did wear the
sheer white muslin style. Moreover, there is ample evi-
dence that women of every class, even on the frontiers,
had some access to information on current fashions, and
usually possessed, if not for everyday use, modified ver-
sions of them.
The origins of the neoclassical influence are visible
in the later eighteenth century. White linen, and later,
cotton, dresses were the standard uniform for infants,
toddlers, and young girls, and entered adult fashion about
1780. During the 1780s and early 1790s, women’s sil-
houettes gradually became slimmer, and the waistline
crept up, the effect heightened by the addition of wide
sashes, whose upper edge approached the level that waist-
lines would in another decade. After 1795, waistlines rose
EMPIRE STYLE
410
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CLOTHING AND FASHION
69134-ECF-E_391-434.qxd 8/16/2004 2:41 PM Page 410