
Environmental Encyclopedia 3
Plate tectonics
liefs that the earth’s crust was solid and immoveable. One
way around this problem was the suggestion that mammoth
land bridges existed between continents. These large bridges
would have allowed the movement of plants and animals
from one continent to another. But no evidence for such
bridges could be found, and this idea eventually fell into
disrepute.
By the mid-1850s, an important breakthrough in geo-
logical thought began to occur. A few geologists started to
accept the hypothesis that the earth’s crust is not as solid
and immovable as it appears. In fact, they said, it may be
that the earth’s outer layer is actually floating (and, thus, is
moveable) on the layer below it, the mantle.
Still, it was not until the early years of the twentieth
century that a new theory of “floating continents” was seri-
ously proposed. Then, in a period of less than four years,
two distinct theories of this kind were suggested. The first
was offered in a December 29, 1908, paper by the American
geologist Frank B. Taylor. Taylor outlined a theory that
described how the continents had slowly shifted over time
with a “mighty creeping movement.”
Taylor’s paper met largely with indifference. Such was
not the fate, however, of the ideas of a German astronomer
and meteorologist, Alfred Wegener. While browsing
through the University of Marburg library in the fall of
1911, Wegener was introduced to the problem of continental
similarities. Almost immediately, he decided to devote his
attention to this question and began a study that was to
dominate the rest of his professional life and to revolutionize
the field of geology.
By January 1912, Wegener had developed a theory to
explain continental similarities. Such similarities cannot be
explained by sunken land bridges, he said, but are the result
of continents having moved slowly across the face of the
planet. Three more years of research were needed before
Wegener’s theory was completed. In 1915, he published
The Origins of Continents and Oceans, summarizing his ideas
about continental similarities.
According to Wegener’s theory, the continents were
once part of one large land mass, which he called Pangaea.
Eventually this land mass broke into two parts, two super-
continents, which he called Gondwanaland and Laurasia.
Over millions of years, Gondwanaland broke apart into
South America, Africa, India, Australia, and
Antarctica
,he
suggested, while Laurasia separated into North America and
Eurasia.
The basic problem Wegener faced was to explain how
huge land masses like continents can flow. His answer was
that the materials of which the earth’s crust is made are of
two very different types. One, then call “sial,” is relatively
light, but strong. The other, then called “sima,” can be
compared to very thick tar. Continents are made of sial, he
1100
said, and sea floors of sima. The differences in these materials
allows continents to “ride” very slowly across sea floors.
Wegener’s theory was met with both rejection and
hostility. Fellow scientists not only disagreed with his ideas,
but also attacked him personally even for suggesting the
ideas. The theory of continental drift did not totally disap-
pear as a result of these attitudes, but it fell into disfavor for
more than three decades.
Research dating to the mid-1930s revealed new fea-
tures of the sea floor which made Wegener’s theory more
plausible. Scientists found sections of the ocean bottoms
through which flows of hot lava were escaping from the
mantle, somewhat like underwater volcanoes. These discov-
eries provided a crucial clue in the development of plate
tectonics, the modern theory of continental drift.
According to the theory of plate tectonics, the upper
layer of the earth is made of a number of plates, large sections
of crust, and the upper mantle. About ten major plates
have been identified. The largest plate is the Pacific Plate,
underlying the Pacific Ocean. The North and South Ameri-
can, Eurasian, African, Indian, Australian, Nazca, Arabian,
Caribbean, and Antarctica are the other major plates.
Scientists believe that plates rest on an especially plastic
portion of the mantle known as the “asthenosphere.” Hot
magma from the asthenosphere seeps upward and escapes
through the ocean floor by way of openings known as rifts.
As the magma flows out of the rift, it pushes apart the plates
adjoining the rift. The edge of the plate opposite the rift is
ultimately forced downward, back into the asthenosphere.
The region in which plate material moves down into the
mantle is a trench.
Plates move at different speeds in different directions
at different times. On an average, they travel 0.4–2 in (1-5
cm) per year. To the extent that this theory is correct, a
map of the earth’s surface ten million years from now will
look quite different from the way it does now.
The theory of plate tectonics explains a number of
natural phenomena that had puzzled scientists for centuries.
Earthquakes, for example, can often be explained as the
sudden, rather than gradual, movement of two adjacent
plates. One of the world’s most famous
earthquake
zones,
the San Andreas Fault, lies at the boundary of the Pacific
and the North American plates. Volcanoes often accompany
the movement of plates and earthquakes. The boundaries
of the Pacific Plate, for example, define a region where
volcanoes are very common, a region sometimes called the
Ring of Fire.
Plate tectonics is now accepted as one of the funda-
mental theories of geology. Its success depends not only on
the discovery of an adequate explanation for continental
movement (sea-floor spreading, rifts, and trenches), but also