
without informing parents) are also important to family dynamics. Privacy also shapes
interpersonal relations in terms of topics commonly discussed and avoided—one may be
warned not to bring up money or
religion
in social gatherings, while business interviews
face strict limits on information that may not be asked (marital status, criminal history not
directly relevant to the position, religion, etc.). Questions of privacy in the information
age have become especially important with regards to the data gathered by bureaucracies
and corporations and how these data are shared and used.
Rights to privacy have been worked out in complex ways throughout American history
Provisions of the
Bill of Rights
testify to the rights to protect the home from quartering
troops (3rd Amendment), unreasonable search and seizure (4th Amendment) and rights to
rotect the individual from testifying against him or herself (5th Amendment). Provisions
dealing with freedom and gun ownership also establish private rights, while dealing with
the extension of private beliefs and action into public forums. In the twentieth century
Supreme Court
decisions extended federal rights to the states. The right to privacy has
also been evoked in court cases that have protected birth control,
abortion
(
Roe
v.
Wade,
1973) and euthanasia; it has been argued less successfully in areas such as
pornography
and sexuality (especially when rights of
children
are called into play). These issues are
also continually debated in issues ranging from
police
rights to use materials “in plain
sight” to control of garbage.
Nonetheless, many Americans feel that their privacy has been threatened in the late
twentieth and early twenty-first centuries by records gathered and kept by schools,
governments (Internal Rev-enue as well as
FBI
), medical providers and corporations.
Storage and access to such records through
computers
and the
Internet,
as well as the
ermeability of electronic communication have increased tension. Corporate mergers also
raise questions of data flows within multipurpose businesses. There is often a strong
ambivalence, too, in these areas as surveillance technologies have become accepted to
control crime, yet are challenged when they extend into private spaces (changing rooms,
bathrooms
) or even control of activity in public spaces (private choices to participate in
public events).
S
ecific laws have been enacted to safeguard medical records and credit materials, but
violations of these expectations are constantly revealed by media. The turmoil of legal
cases involving the
Clinton
White House has also heightened questions about the private
lives of public persons, as well as the ability of the powerful to have access to records
that are presumed to be confidential. One striking index of public sensitivity to these
issues has been the reluctance of many to complete questions of the 2000 census,
including Republican politicians speaking out against this legally established duty.
M
ass media
have heightened sensitivity to the manipulation of private data as well.
Often, this is the stuff of crime novels, programs and movies, although these issues may
e equally apparent in medical dramas. The impact of the potential manipulation o
private information also underscores dystopic visions like
The Net
(1995).
Entries A-Z 909