
1316 
Drilling and Well  Completions 
at the beginning  of  the drilling operations  and changed  at predetermined 
intervals (minimum of 
40 
h). The surface of  the coupon is finished smoothly 
so 
that the effect of  corrosion attack can be easily seen. The coupon is mounted 
in thermoplastic, which insulates it from the drillpipe to prevent the formation 
of  a  galvanic cell  (Figure 
4-472). 
Two  coupons are generally used  per  string, 
one in the kelly-saver  sub and a second at crossover sub above the drill collars 
[205]. 
To  employ effective control measure, it is very important to determine the type 
of  corrosion attack. Spot analysis of  the corrosion film and careful visual  exami- 
nation 
of 
the coupon surface can help in  determining the  type and severity of 
corrosion attack. Generalized corrosion is  represented by  continuous attack  over 
the entire surface, but no pitting. The pitting type of  corrosion is  represented by  a 
high concentration of pits on the coupon surface. This type of  corrosion attack is 
the most  serious attack resulting from drilling fluids, as discussed  earlier. The 
severity of  general corrosion attack can  be  determined by  weighing  the  coupon 
before and after exposure, and comparing the change in weight.  Before installation 
the coupon must be  clean  (Le.,  free of  any  corrosion, grease marks,  drops of 
perspiration,  etc.) and weighed. After exposure to the system  for  a minimum 
of 
40 
hr, the coupon is retrieved, visually examined, then cleaned and reweighed 
within one tenth of  a milligram. The difference between the initial and final weights 
is attributed to corrosion and converted to the corrosion rate (mpy) using Equa- 
tion 
4-349. 
There are several factors such as handling, surface preparation and 
cleaning, etc., which  can affect the results of  the tests. The results obtained from 
this test assume uniform corrosion. Therefore, for proper analysis it becomes very 
important to include a complete description 
of 
the exposed coupons. One of the 
most important factors 
is 
visual inspection of  the coupon, describing the form of 
attack and identifying the corrosion by-product.  It is  not very  difficult to reduce 
the corrosion rate, 
so 
that overall mpy  drops; however, the problem may  still persist 
due to some pitting. It  only takes a few  sharp pits to cause  failure. API  Standard 
RF’ 
13B 
contains complete information on this test 
[206]. 
Procedures provided by 
manufacturers of  corrosion coupons should be followed. 
To  an appreciable degree the coupon experiences the same downhole condi- 
tions as the drillstring does. Therefore, its condition  represents the corrosive 
effects of  the downhole environment. However, limitations of  this test are that 
the coupon is only exposed to the inside of  the drillstring and not subject 
to 
the same stresses. The results obtained are only for certain depth of  exposure, 
while  the corrosion  may  vary  appreciably up and  down  the hole. Finally, the 
results are not available until the tool is pulled out of  the hole. 
Chemical Testing 
During drilling operations, chemical testing of  drilling fluids is  routinely carried 
out in the field. API 
has 
published recommended test procedures such as API 
RP 
13B:  “Standard Field  Procedure for Testing Drilling Fluids” 
[206]. 
A 
number 
of 
service companies such as 
NL 
Baroid, Milchem and IMCO Services supply test 
kits 
for chemical analysis with procedures. These tests conform to standards set in API 
RP 
13B 
[206]. 
The tests monitor the pH of  drilling fluids and detect contaminants, 
such as dissolved gases 
and 
salts. These results are used either 
to 
detect any potential 
problem 
or 
to 
verify the effectiveness 
of 
remedial measures. 
pH 
Determination 
The two  most  commonly used  methods  of  measuring the pH  of  a  drilling 
fluid are a  modified  coalorimetric method,  such as the pHydrion Dispenser;