
Preface   xv
selected by critics or assembled by organizations interested in promoting film. 
None of these other lists, however, is based primarily on the votes of working 
professionals in the motion picture industry, with representation of the cre-
ative talent in all of the crafts that contribute to filmmaking. These working 
professionals understand and appreciate the art, the craft, and the business of 
the movies better than anyone else, and this history of the Hollywood feature 
film recognizes that fact.
This essential history of Hollywood is based on close attention to the 
180 movies found on one or more of these three lists. Other movies may be 
alluded to or mentioned, but this is a story told through the fewer than two 
hundred films that the Academy and AFI have designated as having particular 
significance.
Being about movies, this book is also largely about the people who make 
movies: the creative impulses they feel, how they work, with whom they col-
laborate, and how they adapt to the complicated circumstances surrounding 
the making of Hollywood movies. The other group of people who figure in 
this history are the viewers who make up the audience for movies. Who it is 
that makes up the audience—and when and how the audience changes—has 
great influence on which movies are actually made and released.
At the same time, A History of American Movies is also about structures 
and practices within the workings of the American cinema. For nearly five 
decades, from the 1920s through the 1960s, movies were strongly identified 
with the studios that produced them. During Hollywood’s Classic Era, nearly 
any movie could be thought of as being from a particular studio—a typical 
Warner Bros. production, for example, or a lavish film produced in charac-
teristic MGM style. Since the 1960s, movies have been increasingly identified 
with the names of their individual directors. Either sort of identification may 
be helpful, but it is never sufficient to account consistently for the imaginative 
spark and dominant influence that resulted in a specific motion picture.
The question of who the dominating force is on any particular movie 
must always be treated as an open one. A producer, a director, a screenwriter, 
an actor, a director of photography, an editor, or even a production code 
administrator, a production designer, or someone else working on the movie 
or deciding on its distribution and exhibition may be the most important 
single figure for that particular movie. There are theories that seek to ascribe 
responsibility for the effectiveness of movies in general: for example, the auteur 
theory, which asserts that the movie’s director is always the most dominant 
figure in the making of a movie, or the Schreiber theory, which holds that the 
most important figure is the writer of the screenplay on which any movie is 
based. What is missed by these theories of attribution is that the cinema is 
a collaborative art, and that the story of any particular movie is in how the