
< previous page page_276 next page >
Page 276
 by quantitative metathesis, the position of the accent betraying the originally short final vowel. An alternative
explanation, which starts with a declensional pattern *polei-s/ polj-os, etc., with a levelling to *polej-os etc., hardly
seems preferable, for this analogical generalization would have to be dated before the proto-Greek change *poleis
to poleis (Osthoff's Law), while the insertion of polis, polin in this levelled declension would remain without
explanation. In all dialects except Attic the stem form -i was extended throughout the declension: 
, etc. The accusative form   owes its ending to the consonant stems.
In the u-stems type 1 is represented by *doru > 
, *dorwos >  , *dorwei >  , *dorwH2 >  ,
*dorwon > 
. In the type 2 the original inflexions were: singular, *-us, *-ou, *-um, *-eus, *-ewei, *-eu;
plural *-ewes, *-uns, *-uwom, *-usu. In Greek the e-grade, as with -i/-ei stems, was extended to all cases except
the nominative, vocative and accusative singular: e.g. 
, with the plural   <  , 
(<  ),  . In Attic the genitive is  , where the accent indicates an earlier  , with a
grade which might be traced to the vrddhied locative form in *-eu. It is conceivable, however, that a word like 
 might have been influenced by the declension of   so that   parallels  . In non-Attic dialects
the genitive singular has  , and this is found even in Attic in the u-adjectives, e.g.   < *swadewos,
this being a refashioning of the expected 
. *suju- 'son' shows forms belonging to both declensional types: 
 (Cretan),   (Attic),   (Cretan),   (Homer) < *suwjos,   (Homer) < *sujwi,   (Homer) < *sujwes, 
(Cretan> < *sujuns.. The full-grade suffix -ew- also appears in   >  .
Mycenaean presents the dative form ijewe, plausibly interpreted as hijewei, with nominative iju = hijus, both with
dissimilatory loss of the first u. Dissimilation was also presumably responsible for the passage to the thematic class 
, etc. (Homer, etc.). To the u- stems also belong the diphthongal stems of the type  , and  . The root
*dei- 'shine' with u-suffixation gave rise to the base forms I *dei-w- (Latin deivos/divus) and II *dj-ew-. From the
latter comes the vrddhied nominative *dj-eu-s. In the accusative the IE form *dje-m, with
 
< previous page page_276 next page >