
If I record the conversations around me and transcribe them onto the page,
I’m re-creating life. The result may sound convincing, but it begs the ques-
tion: So what? I’m not writing the discourse; I’m simply writing it down — a
big difference. But if I spend time replaying the conversations, weighing one
section against another, selecting between them, and then reconnecting
those portions, I’m designing life. I have a grand scheme in mind. Writers
create a text in this way. Even when they’re adapting from a source or pulling
from historical events, they’re selecting which pieces to include and how to
present them with a grand scheme in mind.
Responsible writers ask two central questions at some point in their process:
What kind of world do I want to design?
Why design that world in place of others?
Implicit in these questions is the idea of choice. Between you and every cre-
ative decision lie at least three options. Will your character survive, perish,
or simply leave the story? Should you kill a character on-screen or off-screen
or begin the action and then cut to another moment? Do you set the scene in
Paris, Prague, or Rome? Sometimes, you make a choice based on logic — he’s
Italian, so the memory scenes take place in Florence. Sometimes, you make a
choice based on style — that dark alleyway fits the film noir genre better than
a crowded street because film noir is a style that relies heavily on shadow
and mystique. These decisions often take care of themselves; they just make
sense. The more difficult choices — how do you kill a character on-screen,
how explicit is your language, is a scene funny or offensive — are based on
ethics.
Artists sometimes bristle at the word ethics. And yet, every script exists in an
ethical realm. The study of ethics is the study of human motivation. You’re
presenting work to an audience, and that audience will weigh the choices
that you’ve made therein. They’ll search for motivations for each character
action, and they’ll judge those characters accordingly. Are the characters
honorable or despicable, do they elicit praise or disdain, are they trustwor-
thy or two-faced, why do they behave the way that they do? These questions
are ethical questions, and because it’s your job to guide an audience through
your piece, they merit your attention.
Unfortunately, ethical has come to mean “family oriented” or “innocuous.”
Under this definition, films with violence, cursing, and sexual content become
unethical, forcing artists to censor themselves in undesirable ways. I’m
not using the term in this way. Many of the most troublesome and thought-
provoking films are written for ethical purposes. Charlie Chaplin’s The Great
Dictator and Steven Spielberg’s Schindler’s List tackle the Holocaust in
ethical ways. They’re not meant to be comfortable or easy to watch; they’re
meant to invite debate. Crash challenged racial and economic stereotypes
throughout. The controversy around this film also created buzz, or
Hollywood attention, which helped it win the Oscar. These films aren’t
172
Part II: Breaking Down the Elements of a Story
18_345405-ch12.qxp 5/22/08 7:38 PM Page 172