
184 THE HAN
other with an opportunity to serve. The stipends may have been far
from large, and the service often as much
a
socially acceptable counter-
feit as anything of real substance, but nontheless it defined, as nothing
else could, the place of
this
privileged and shamefully underemployed
class within the community. By whatever yardstick, therefore, the
han
formed an integral part of Japanese life.
Nobody in Tokugawa Japan could have doubted the importance of
the han, just as nobody would seriously contest it now. But such was
not always the case. For more than seventy years after the han were
abolished in 1871, they and their function in Tokugawa society were
substantially ignored. During the late nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries, Japanese scholars - servants themselves of strong central
government - took their own preoccupations with state power and
imperial loyalty with them when they studied the Edo period, only
rarely looking beyond the bakufu, its individual leaders, and what
their attitude toward the imperial court in Kyoto might have been.
Insofar as the han were considered at all, it was through their associa-
tion with individual daimyo - Tokugawa Mitsukuni of
Mito,
for exam-
ple,
or Hoshina Masayuki of Aizu - statesmen whose devotion to the
imperial house or to Confucian morality seemed exemplary enough to
warrant attention. Of the considerable role played by the han them-
selves in the social, economic, cultural, and institutional life of their
time,
little notice was taken.
2
Only after World War II did attention shift significantly in the
direction of han studies, largely through the leadership of ltd Tasa-
buro,
a historian at the University of
Tokyo.
Even before the war Ito's
research on a number of individual
han
- Mito, Kii, Nakamura, and
Tsushima among them - had delineated a whole new field for histori-
cal research. Then, in 1956, with the publication of
his Bakuhan taisei
(The bakuhan system), he brought han studies to academic promi-
nence. As the title of his book suggests, the han were now to be
recognized as entities distinct from, and in a sense comparable to, the
Tokugawa bakufu with which they shared responsibility for governing
Japan. At the same time Ito Tasaburo, and the group of like-minded
scholars he gathered around him - Taniguchi Sumio, Kobayashi Seiji,
Kanai Madoka, and Fujino Tamotsu, among others - have between
them, individually and as members of the Hanseishi kenkyukai (Soci-
2 See, for example, the old standard works on Tokugawa history: Yoshida Togo, Tokugawa
seikyo ko, 2 vols. (Tokyo: Fuzambo, 1894); Ikeda Koen,
Tokugawa
jidai shi (Tokyo: Waseda
daigaku shuppanbu, 1909); and Kurita Mototsugu, Sogo Nihonshi gaisetsu ge (Tokyo:
Chubunkan, 1943).
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008