
WAR AND PEACE 269
Korea, they would be going to their deaths. There were rumors that a
rebellion would surely spring up and put an early end to Hideyoshi's
plans,
but none among the daimyo wanted to bell the cat: They all
were terror stricken and rendered incapable of conspiracy by the ty-
rant. Even as he intimidated and
fleeced
the Japanese lords, Hideyoshi
sought to console them with expectations of rewards in Korea and
China. For instance, he apparently promised three Chinese provinces
to the "Christian daimyo" Dom Protasio Arima (Harunobu, the lord
of Arima in Hizen, 1567-1612). It is likely that, as Frois states, the
recipients of such assurances of future favor, profuse though they may
have been with expressions of gratitude to Hideyoshi's face, in actual-
ity wished nothing more than to hold on to their pieces of their native
land and were scared stiff of their master's talk of a transfer to such
distant if dilated dominions.
50
To be sure, there were also those like
the lord of Saga in Hizen, Nabeshima Naoshige (i538-1618), who
actively solicited reinvestment with a fief in China on the not-
unreasonable grounds that his native province had close traditional
ties with that country - "because a great many of the people of the
Hizen seacoast have been over there on
bahan
business and are quite
used and attached to China."
51
Japanese historians have variously sought to explain the reasons for
Hideyoshi's overseas venture. Their opinions range from that ex-
pressed by Tanaka Yoshinari, who wrote in 1905 that it was a type of
manifest destiny - a "tidal force" - that drove the Japanese to expand
overseas, to the more dyspeptic notion of Suzuki Ryoichi, who sug-
gested in the early 1950s that the invasion of the mainland proceeded
naturally from Hideyoshi's tyrannical character and that, in his urge to
become an absolute ruler, he first used the daimyo to quash popular
energies within Japan and then directed their aggressive impulses to-
ward the neighboring country.
52
Suzuki's interpretation should at least
be amended to allow for Hideyoshi's, that spectacular parvenu's, extra-
50 See Frois, Historia, pt. 3, chap. 51, ed. Wicki, vol. 5 (1984; note that the running headline of
this volume, "Segunda pane," conflicts with its half-title, p. 1, "Terceira Pane da Historia de
Japam"), pp. 382-6; Matsuda and Kawasaki, trans.,
Furoisu
Nihonshi, vol. 2 (1977), pp.
160-6. Cf. Tamon'in nikki, vol. 4, pp. 337, 339-40, entries for Tensho 20 (i592).2.28 and
3.15. A rebellion did occur in 1592, but it was abortive. The ringleader, Umekita Kunikane,
a vassal of the Shimazu, was killed before he could accomplish anything. His wife was burned
before the assembled grandees in a garden of Nagoya Castle, "pour encourager les autres."
The episode caused a delay in the dispatch of Satsuma troops to Korea.
51 Kato Kiyomasa to Natsuka Masaie and Mashita Nagamori, Tensho 20.6.24; quoted exten-
sively by Nakamura, Nissen kankei shi, vol. 2, p. 262.
52 The major interpretations are synopsized by Kitajima Manji,
Chosen
nichinichiki,
Korai nikki:
Hideyoshi no
Chosen
shintyaku to
sono rekishiteki kokuhatsu
(Nikki,
kiroku
niyoru Nihon
rekishi
sosho,
kinsei 4) (Tokyo: Soshiete, 1982), pp. 17-19.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008