
CHRISTIAN DAIMYO 367
and his successor Hidetada (1579-1632, r. 1605-23). And the allega-
tion that the magistrate charged with the government of one of the
shogunate's most important direct holdings, the port city of Nagasaki,
had become the object of an assassination plot raised broader ques-
tions regarding the loyalty of the western daimyo.
75
It did not help
matters that both the principals in this nasty business, Protasio Arima
and Paulo Okamoto, were Christians.
For his part in the Okamoto Daihachi incident, Dom Protasio
Arima was first exiled from his province and then sentenced to death.
But the incident had far broader consequences than the punishment of
this one daimyo. The Tokugawa turned against Christianity with a
vengeance, prohibiting the religion in shogunal domains. Needless to
say, this measure was imitated by their subjects, the domanial rulers.
One of the first who sought to ingratiate themselves with the Toku-
gawa that way was Harunobu's son, Dom Miguel Arima (Naozumi,
1586-1641), who apostatized, was installed by the shogunate as
daimyo in Arima, and immediately began a massive effort to force his
Catholic subjects into abandoning their faith. Not successful enough
in that effort to please his masters, he was in 1614 transferred to
another
fief,
Nobeoka in Hyuga. He left behind him
a
restive Christian
populace and the seedbed of the Shimabara Rebellion, a large-scale
disturbance that broke out in 1637 and confirmed the Edo bakufu in
its cherished conviction that Christianity was a subversive faith.
The basic rationale for that judgment was laid out on February 1,
1614 (Keicho 18.12.23), f°
r
the rest of the Tokugawa era in a docu-
ment that had the force of an ancestral law, because it was written at
the behest of the founding father, Ieyasu. This "Statement on the
Expulsion of the Bateren," which was drafted by the Zen monk
Konchiin Suden (1563-1633), first rehearses the standard traditional-
ist dictum, "Japan is the Land of the Gods," and then declares that the
Christians seek to make Japan into "their own possession." Their
religion teaches them to "contravene governmental regulations, tra-
duce Shinto, calumniate the True Law, destroy righteousness, corrupt
goodness" - in short, to subvert the native Japanese, the Buddhist,
and the Confucian foundations of the social order. What else was this
if not
jaho,
the ultimate "pernicious doctrine?"
76
75 See Shimizu Hirokazu, Kirishilan kinseishi, vol. 109 of Kyoikusha rekishi
shinsko:
Nihonshi
(Tokyo: Kyoikusha, 1981), pp. 98-101.
76 The original text can be found conveniently in Okubo Toshiaki, Kodama Kota, Yanai Kenji,
and Inoue Mitsusada, eds., Shiryo ni yom Nihon no ayumi (kinsei) (Tokyo: Yoshikawa
kobunkan, 1963), pp. 124-5.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008