415
(and usually for an increase in) the govern-
ment transfers, subsidies, social security pay-
ments and salary bonuses for public servants
on which the largely unproductive local
economies depend. Some parties, which usu-
ally garner the majority of the vote, strongly
defend the attachment of the DOM-TOMs to
mainland France as a guarantee of economic
prosperity, public order and international se-
curity. Pointing out that residents of the DOM-
TOMs are fully fledged French citizens with
the right of abode in the metropole and duly
elected representatives in government, they
reject the claim that the DOM-TOMs repre-
sent cases of persistent colonialism and insist
that incorporation is a different form of
decolonization.
Opposition groups argue that the DOM-
TOMs are indeed vestiges of colonialism
which, immediately or in due course, ought to
gain independence. Independence movements
are absent only in the smallest DOM-TOMs,
St-Pierre-et-Miquelon, Wallis and Futuna, and
Mayotte. In Martinique and French Guiana,
and especially in Guadeloupe and Reunion,
there was considerable indépendantiste activ-
ity in the 1970s, but thereafter it diminished
markedly because of government crackdowns
on militant extraparliamentary protests, the
administrative decentralization of the 1980s,
and the waning of the radical views with
which pro-independence positions were
linked. In 1981, Aimé Césaire, poet of
négritude and long-time député from
Martinique, called for a moratorium on de-
bates concerning status, and many politicians
in the DOMs seem to have heeded his coun-
sel. Small indépendantiste groups remain ac-
tive but have failed to gain political power.
In New Caledonia, the struggle between
indépendantistes and ‘loyalists’ reached new
heights in the 1980s. Most indépendantistes
came from the indigenous Melanesian popu-
lation (Kanaks), who had been reduced to a
demographic minority by the immigration of
Europeans, Asians and Polynesians. The ex-
pansion of pastoral, mining and settler inter-
ests had led to the dispossession of
Melanesians from much of their ancestral
land. Not until the late 1950s were all
Melanesians granted the suffrage. Long-term
European settlers (Caldoches) and more recent
European migrants continued to monopolize
political power and pocket the profits
from the territory’s rich nickel mines. Deep-
seated Melanesian grievances fuelled
proindependence sentiment and led to the for-
mation of a Front Indépendantiste, which
briefly gained control of the territorial assem-
bly in the early 1980s. In 1984, a coalition of
political parties, a trade union and a women’s
group formed the Front de Libération
Nationale Kanak et Socialiste (FLNKS) under
the leadership of Jean-Marie Tjibaou; the
FLNKS and a smaller pro-independence party
won the support of four-fifths of Kanaks. The
majority of the Caldoches joined the
Rassemblement pour la Calédonie dans la
République (RPCR), led by Jacques Lafleur;
the RPCR secured the support of other ethnic
groups, worried about their future in an inde-
pendent ‘Kanaky’. In 1985, a proposal by the
government to move towards New Caledo-
nian ‘independence-in-association’ with
France satisfied none of the parties and aggra-
vated political polarization. The next few
years saw occasional boycotting of elections
by the FLNKS and violence—physical harass-
ment, riots, hostage-takings, and attacks by
newly formed militias—carried out by both
Kanaks and Caldoches; the police and army
often responded with heavy-handed tactics.
Tensions increased further during the period
of cohabitation after 1986, when Jacques
Chirac’s government cast its lot with the ‘loy-
alists’ and, particularly, with the RPCR, which
was affiliated with Chirac’s own party. A par-
ticularly tragic episode of hostage-taking by a
Kanak group on the island of Ouvéa, followed
by a bloody military attempt to free the hos-
tages, occurred in the midst of the presidential
campaign of 1988. Subsequently, the new gov-
ernment of Michel Rocard succeeded in con-
vincing the FLNKS and the RPCR to sign the
Matignon Accords, which divided New Cal-
edonia into three ‘provinces’ (two of which
came under Kanak control, although the ma-
jor city, Nouméa, and its region remained
parties and movements: DOM-TOMs