
  the emperor’s celluloid army marches on 153
denounced  Pride for its sympathetic portrayal of former Army Minister Tojo 
Hideki, its denial of the Nanjing Massacre, and its insistence that Japan waged 
war in its own self-defense as well as for the (successful) liberation of Asia.
57
 Film-
makers throughout South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and other former imperial 
territories are increasingly challenging historical views of the legacy of Japanese 
imperialism in Asia like those presented in Pride. In South Korea, director Lee Si-
Myung’s big-budget science-fi ction fantasy 2009: Lost Memories questions what 
would happen if Japan used a time machine to return to the past to erase the 
shame of defeat and regain its Asian empire.
58
 This modern-day struggle over 
“correct” interpretations of history is reminiscent of the Hollywood/Japanese fi lm 
wars of the 1930s and 1940s, as theaters across Asia have once again become sites 
where fi lms almost literally shoot back to each other.
Negative representations of Japanese imperialism in East and Southeast Asian 
cinema are nothing new. Filmmakers have been coming to terms with the legacy 
of Japanese empire there since 1945. The last ten years have seen a defi nite shift 
from industry-wide dependency on the documentary, art-house, or period-fi lm 
genres to lighter, more popular ones that were previously considered compara-
tively trivial and inappropriate for representing serious historical “facts.” Con-
temporary action fi lms, comedies, sci-fi , and sports fi lms are all broaching the 
subject of empire, which suggests a liberalization of the generic boundaries for 
what constitutes politically and commercially viable fi lms about the Japanese 
colonial era. In the increasingly global Asian fi lm market, every fi lm—including 
those that deal with empire—must reach multiple markets.
Over the past fi ve years, government deregulation, the liberalization of Asian 
fi lm markets, and global capital have all contributed to an increase in the num-
ber of Asian coproductions created for export throughout Asia and even North 
America and Europe.
59
 Chinese fi lms like Purple Butterfl y (Zi hudie, 2003) and 
Japanese fi lms such as T.R .Y. (2003) acknowledge emerging Asian markets by con-
sciously using big budgets, multinational casting, and overseas locations to sell 
Asian stars to young “Pan-Asian” viewers in regional markets. Intriguingly, many 
of these coproductions are set in the era of empire. T.R.Y. tells the story of a Japa-
nese con man named Izawa Shu, who lives in Shanghai in 1911. He runs a Robin 
Hood-like multiethnic band of swindlers that includes a Korean, Park Chengik, 
and a Chinese, Chen Siping. Izawa helps a Chinese revolutionary group sting the 
Imperial Japanese Army out of a trainload of weapons to aid a budding Chinese 
revolution. The fi lm’s producers sought to break into the “Asian fi lm market” 
by casting Japanese actor Oda Yuji, with supporting actors from China, such 
as Shao Bing, Yang Ruoxi and Peter Ho, and Korean actor Sohn Chang-Min.
60
 
Oda’s large fan base and “crossover appeal” in China and other Asian markets 
came from the success of his popular TV series Tok yo Love Story.
61
 The producers 
believed that in the globalized markets of China and Korea Oda’s Japanese-ness 
Baskett05.indd   153Baskett05.indd   153 2/8/08   10:49:03 AM2/8/08   10:49:03 AM