
174  notes to pages 2–7
annexation was conducted by a consensus of the world’s nations. I do not intend to justify 
Japanese annexation 100 percent. From their [the Koreans’] emotional point of view, it 
probably was annoying, maybe even humiliating. But if anything, it was the responsibility 
of their ancestors.” Mainichi shinbun, Oct. 29, 2003. 
9. Notable examples include: Nanking 1937 (1995, Hong Kong, dir. Wu Ziniu); Devils 
on the Doorstep (Guizi lai le, 2000, China, dir. Jiang Wen); Purple Butterfl y (Zi hudie, 
2003, China, dir. Lou Ye); City of Sadness (Beiqing chengshi, 1989, Taiwan, dir. Hou 
Hsiao Hsien); A Borrowed Life (Duo-sang, 1994, Taiwan, dir. Wu Nien-Jen); Boys Will Be 
Boys, Boys Will Be Men (2000, Thailand, dir. Euthana Mukdasanit); Behind the Paint-
ing (Khanglang phap, 2001, Thailand, dir. Cherd Songsri); In the Bosom of the Enemy 
(Gatas: Sa dibdib ng kaaway, 2001, Philippines, dir. Gil Portes); Aishite imasu (Mahal kita) 
1941 (2004, Philippines, dir. Joel Lamangan); Embun (2002, Malaysia, dir. Erma Fatima); 
Budak nafsu (1983, Indonesia, dir. Syuman Djaya).
10. Edward Said, Culture and Imperialism (New York: Vintage, 1993), 12.
11. A 1938 U.S. Department of Commerce report on foreign fi lm markets explained: 
“It has frequently been pointed out that Japan has the reputation of being the largest 
producer of motion pictures for home consumption in the world. This reputation has 
been built up by a ‘grinding out’ policy of production, with quality of secondary consid-
eration and decidedly inferior to that of American and European productions. In spite of 
the large meterage of fi lm produced, Japanese producers cannot make suffi cient quality 
feature fi lms to supply the domestic market.” The report also suggests that Japan’s massive 
newsreel production contributes to the infl ated numbers. See U.S. Department of Com-
merce, Motion Picture Division, ed., Review of Foreign Markets (Washington, DC, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1938), 305. The Japanese Home Ministry reported that Japan 
produced 580 fi lms to America’s 548 (compare with Britain, 150; Germany, 125; France, 
121; China, 75; and Italy, 37) quoted in Eiga bunka tenrankaiki (Dainippon eiga kyokai, 
1940), 69 [chart 10]. 
12. Joseph Nye, Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power (Basic Books, 
1990), 32–33.
13. Daniel Headrick The Tools of Empire (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), 4.
14. Paul Virilio War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception (New York: Verso, 1989).
15. Ella Shohat and Robert Stam, Unthinking Eurocentrism (London: Routledge, 1994), 
100.
16. John MacKenzie Propaganda and Empire (Manchester: Manchester University 
Press, 1986), 72–73. Guido Convents, “Film and German Colonial Propaganda,” in Prima 
di Caligari (Biblioteca dell’Immagine, 1990), 58–76. Sabine Hake, “Mapping the Native 
Body,” in Friedrichsmeyer, ed., The Imperialist Imagination (Ann Arbor: University of 
Michigan Press, 1998), 163–187. 
17. Koga Futoshi, ed. Hikari no tanjo Lumière! (Asahi Shinbun, 1995); and Yoshida Yosh-
ishige et al., 
Eiga torai-shinematogurafu to [Meiji no Nihon] (I
w
anami Shoten, 1995).
18. Other Lumière fi lms include: Japanese Actors: Trying on Wigs (Acteurs japonais: Ex-
ercice de la perruque, 1898); Japanese Dances: 1–3 (Danse japonaise: 1–III, 1899); Japanese 
Woman Puts on Make up (Japonaise faisant sa toilette, 1899). Freres Pathé, Edison, and 
later Vitagraph also produced Japan-themed fi lms within a year or two of 1897.
Baskett07_nts.indd   174Baskett07_nts.indd   174 2/8/08   10:50:05 AM2/8/08   10:50:05 AM