
Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) believed that strong central direction would
enlarge cultural interests and help overcome social divisions. The result was the
dominance of a London-centred middle-class elite culture.
85
Universities in their
modern form played a major and complex part in the reproduction of British
culture. Owen’s College in Manchester and the Yorkshire College at Leeds were
products of local initiatives, sponsored by local groups of businessmen, with local
economic interests in mind. Lancashire chemicals and Yorkshire textiles both
stood to gain from the work of their local colleges. Local identity was rapidly
disciplined by two factors, the financial power of the University Grants
Committee and the desire of all institutions to participate in an active and
resourceful international scientific and humanistic culture.
86
The Labour move-
ment changed in the same way, based upon local organisation, the Co-op, the
ILP branch, the socialist Sunday School and the Woodcraft Folk it was rapidly
restructured as a national movement with powerful centralising ambitions. In St
Helens ‘the men at that time became labour people through reading books and
papers . . . the party nationally used to send them out’.
87
At the same time the urban places were changing their social identity. During
the nineteenth century, British towns were middle class. Municipal heroes like
Joseph Chamberlain and William Chambers were from the middle-class elite. In
map, newspaper and directory towns were presented as creations of their middle-
class elite. By the mid-twentieth century middle-class identity had retreated to
the suburbs. For the working classes the journey was in the opposite direction.
The late nineteenth-century working classes operated around the neighbour-
hood.
88
The poor were a product of the slum.
89
During the s and s, the
identity of the town became a working-class one. This move can be seen in
urban politics, in urban leisure identities and in the cultural products and expe-
riences of the towns. This reflected the slow change in the relationship between
capital, labour and the specific urban place. During the nineteenth century,
urban capital mobility was limited. Transaction costs were high because of the
wide range of location specific externalities for the owners of local capital. The
owner merchant-manufacturer benefited from local reputation in terms of
credit. Each industry was surrounded by its supporting services. There was a
R. J. Morris
85
Asa Briggs, The Golden Age of Wireless, vol. of The History of the Broadcasting in the United Kingdom
(Oxford, ), pp. and –; John Whale, The Politics of the Media (London, ); Raymond
Williams, Television,Technology and Cultural Form (London, ).
86
R. H. Kargon, Science in Victorian Manchester (Manchester, ), pp. –; P. H. J. H. Gosden
and A. J. Taylor, eds., Studies in the History of a University, to Commemorate the Centenary of the
University of Leeds, – (Leeds, ), pp. –.
87
Charles Forman, Industrial Town (London, ), p. .
88
G. Stedman Jones, ‘Working-class culture and working-class politics in London, –: notes
on the remaking of a working class’, Soc.Hist., (); E. Ross, ‘Survival networks – women’s
neighbourhood sharing in London before World War I’, History Workshop, (), –.
89
Mayne, The Imagined Slum.
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008