
Salvationists, Sunday School pupils, Temperance workers, and others, right
through until the conflagration of devoured Paxton’s iron and glass master-
piece – although by this time some of its other functions had been usurped by
Olympia (), Earl’s Court () and Wembley ().
34
Tourists and provincial excursionists had also boosted theatre audiences in
, though few ventured east to the thriving theatres in Hoxton and
Shoreditch, which catered for local workers at one sitting, and later for return-
ing city clerks. Here, and in lesser popular theatres and ‘penny gaffs’ catering for
even the poorest, migrants and settlers found warmth, sociability, entertainment
and excitement. As in other cities they cheered Shakespearean ghosts and battles
and melodrama – including Boucicault’s much-adapted Poor of Paris, London,
Birmingham etc. However, population movements and the development of music
hall and cinema meant that East End theatre was a shadow of its former self by
. By contrast, suburban train services in the s and s and the cutting
of Shaftesbury Avenue and Charing Cross Road in the s stimulated the
‘West End’, hosting the genial satires of Gilbert and Sullivan and a new drawing-
room drama for the train-borne middle classes. The West End boom resumed
after producing ninety theatres (Manchester had nine, Birmingham,
Glasgow and Liverpool six each, and Edinburgh, Leeds, Sheffield, Belfast,
Newcastle and Cardiff three apiece).
35
However, the glamorous ‘super-cinemas’of the s ossified theatrical devel-
opment. Moving pictures had first been seen in music halls (and fairs) in .
The cuckoo did not immediately take over the nest, but by - London had
ninety-four purpose-built cinemas, and altogether. Many were rudimentary
‘blood tubs’, a few were ‘picture palaces’ on Oxford Street catering for the ‘car-
riage trade’. Cinema received enormous impetus during – and by
Douglas A. Reid
34
Altick, The Shows of London, pp. , , , –, ; Simmons, Victorian Railway, p. ; K.
Baedeker, London and its Environs (London, ), pp. ‒; Chadwick, The Victorian Church, ,
pp. –; Michael Musgrave, The Musical Life of the Crystal Palace (Cambridge, ), pp. –,
–, ‒, –, –; Lawrence Magnanie, ‘An event in the culture of co-operation:
national co-operative festivals at Crystal Palace’, in S. Yeo, New Views of Co-operation (London,
), pp. –; Jones, Workers at Play,p.; New Survey of London Life and Labour, , pp. ,
–.
35
Clive Barker, ‘The audiences of the Britannia Theatre, Hoxton’, Theatre Quarterly, , no.
(), ‒; Jim Davis, ‘The East End’, in M. R. Booth and J. H. Kaplan, eds., The Edwardian
Theatre: Essays on Performance and the Stage (Cambridge, ), pp. –; F. Sheppard, London
(Oxford, ), p. ; New Survey of London Life and Labour, , pp. –; Michael R. Booth,
English Melodrama (London, ); D. A. Reid, ‘Popular theatre in Victorian Birmingham’, in
David Bradby, Louis James and Bernard Sharratt, eds., Performance and Politics in Popular Drama
(Cambridge, ), pp. –; Jeremy Crump, ‘The popular audience for Shakespeare in nine-
teenth century Leicester’, in Richard Foulkes, ed., Shakespeare and the Victorian Stage (Cambridge,
), pp. ‒; John Springhall, ‘Leisure and Victorian youth: the penny theatre in London
–’, in J. S. Hurt, ed., Childhood, Youth and Education in the Late Nineteenth Century
(Leicester, ); Allardyce Nicoll, English Drama – (Cambridge, ), pp. , ; A. A.
Jackson, The Middle Classes, – (Nairn, ), pp. –, –, –, .
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008