
of the young women, and our first impression is that this is a harmonious, well-
fed, neatly dressed, attractive group of workers. The winning glance of the dark-
haired beauty in the foreground could be assimilated to this generally favourable
view of the benefits of the factory system, except that some of the less promi-
nent figures, partly hidden behind the low wall, or else on the extreme edge of
the picture, or in the shaded yard in the background, are engaged in dubious
activities. A bottle of strong drink consumed, a transaction with a man, a
meeting with a lover – all these scarcely decipherable motifs raise doubts about
the moral health of the personnel and the suitability of paid work, large-scale
workplaces and the urban environment itself for vulnerable, perhaps flighty,
young women. Certainly, the vigilance of the tiny figure of the policeman in
the road at the back is advisable. However, the picture does not convince us that
his efforts are sufficient to seal off the workplace from the dangerous currents of
the city. The women’s beauty, then, is no longer simply a delight and a reassu-
rance, it is also a source of anxiety.
In , Adolphe Smith and John Thomson published a series of photographs
of workers and the poor on the streets of London entitled Street Life in London.
36
They were, they said, producing an update on Mayhew’s work, and Smith’s text
develops the personal stories of the people photographed by Thomson. In these
stories we learn of the mutable fortunes of the characters and of the illusory or
ephemeral quality of the goods that they trade: water-ice, advertising placards,
patent medicines (Plate ). The shots are taken out of doors and, while the main
character may be posed and centred, additional figures and details creep into the
composition, destabilising and blurring the arrangement. There is a strong sense
of an environment in flux, and lives subject to uncontrollable forces. The themes
of presence and absence that we discerned in Annan’s photographic work appear
here too, but the human life of the city, rather than the physical environment, is
the major focus. The most prominent figure in the first picture of the book,
‘London Nomades’, is a woman on the steps of the van (Plate ). We learn from
the text that, two weeks after the photograph had been taken, she was found
mysteriously murdered. We have to conclude that the evidence of our eyes, or
the indexical record of the photograph, will not provide an adequate empirical
basis for grasping the city. At this point, viewers could not rely, as the viewers of
the s and s had done, on moral judgements based on careful looking
and firm categorisation.
37
Smith and Thomson’s work can be taken as a marker
which indicates a loss of confidence with regard to the modern city.
The representation of the city in the visual arts
36
Street Life in London initially appeared in as a part-work and, later that year, as a bound
volume.
37
This kind of controlling vision has been associated with Foucault’s notion of surveillance and the
operations of the panopticon; M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish:The Birth of the Prison, trans. A.
Sheridan (Harmondsworth, ). See G. Pollock, ‘Power and visibility in the city’ (review
article), Art History, (), –; Tagg, The Burden of Representation; and T. Bennett, The
Birth of the Museum: History,Theory, Politics (London and New York, ).
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008