
to believe in God, although only one in ten went to church at all regularly. Few
thought much about religion, though they wanted it taught in schools, but when
they did it meant ‘little more than being kind and neighbourly, doing good when
opportunity arises’. While there was considerable anti-clericalism based on the
class differences between clergy and people there was also regard for ‘saintly’
individual clergymen, and overt hostility to God and religion was rarer; however,
both City missionary reports and subsequent oral history interviews do some-
times reveal a bitter rejection of an apparently uncaring deity.
89
One of the most suggestive indications of a basic or residual religiosity was
the reliance on the churches to sanctify life’s crucial turning points, although
there were often several layers of meaning invested in the rites of passage. In the
s two-thirds of all English infants were baptised, and more than two-thirds
of all marriages were religiously solemnised, as were virtually all funerals.
Thereafter the trend was downwards but only slowly. Although there were mar-
ginal groups such as nineteenth-century common lodging house dwellers for
whom marriage was rare, among the majority of the domiciled poor it was the
norm, and women particularly insisted that it should be solemnised in a church,
thereby gaining access to both respectability and Divine blessing at an auspicious
time in their lives. Superstitions regarding the power of the clergyman to inter-
cede against malign fate also played their part in such rituals, as illustrated by the
idea that the ‘churching’ ceremony for postpartum mothers would guard against
an immediate subsequent pregnancy, or against a miscarriage – or with regard to
‘Watch Night’ services, the provision of which was sometimes forced upon
unwilling clergy by rowdy East Enders in the s. There was also a certain
instrumentalism, such as the expectation of benefits from attendance at that late
nineteenth-century urban paradox, the Harvest Festival: ‘cadging’ was deeply
deplored by the consciously self-respecting but it was an inevitable feature of
extremely poor districts in London, Liverpool and elsewhere, and still evident
in ‘Metrop’ in .
90
Playing and praying
89
M. Loane, The Queen’s Poor: Life as they Find it in Town and Country (London, ; edn),
pp. , –; McLeod, Class and Religion, pp. –; Cox, The English Churches in a Secular Society,
p. ; Ainsworth, ‘Religion in the working class community’, esp. –; McLeod, ‘New per-
spectives on Victorian working-class religion’, –, –; Lewis, Lighten their Darkness, p. ;
Mass-Observation, Puzzled People:A Study in Popular Attitudes to Religion, Ethics,Progress and Politics
in a London Borough (London, ), pp. , , –, , –, , .
90
Loane, The Queen’s Poor,pp., , –; Currie, Gilbert and Horsley, Churches and Church-Goers,
pp. –, –; Brown, Social History of Religion in Scotland,p.; McLeod, Class and Religion,
pp. ‒, –; McKibbin, Classes and Cultures,pp.–; Humphries, Hooligans or Rebels?,
pp. –; McLeod, ‘New perspectives on Victorian working-class religion’, ; Booth, Life and
Labour of the People in London, rd series, , p. ;Cox,The English Churches in a Secular Society,
pp. –, –, ‒; Lewis, Lighten their Darkness,pp.–; Ross, Love and Toil,pp.–; John
Kent, ‘Feelings and festivals: an interpretation of some working-class religious attitudes’, in Dyos
and Wolff, eds., TheVictorian City, , pp. –; Williams, ‘Urban popular religion’, pp. , ;
Walker, ‘Religious changes in Liverpool’, ; McLeod, Piety and Poverty,pp.–, ; Green,
Religion in the Age of Decline,pp.–, –; Mass-Observation, Puzzled People,pp., .
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008