
a victory or to commemorate fulfillment of a request
for divine intervention. Records show that occasion-
ally such donations were reclaimed by the owner
when required in an emergency.
Types of armor, materials used, decorative details,
condition, and the defensive capabilities of protective
gear varied among samurai of different rank
throughout the medieval and early modern eras.
Foot soldiers were easily recognized on the battle-
field not only because the majority of troops
belonged to this class, but also because they wore rel-
atively simple, easily adjusted armor and helmets that
included minimal ornamentation. By contrast,
Japanese armor produced for the elite members of
the samurai class, such as daimyo or even shoguns,
included sumptuous decoration, and was augmented
by symbols to ensure bravery and victory as well as
crests to indicate one’s affiliation and service. For
example, since it was believed that dragonflies could
not fly backward, dragonflies were depicted on armor
to represent the hope that there would be no retreat,
and thus defeat, for the soldier who wore the suit.
Although most Japanese armor was created pri-
marily with practical considerations in mind, armor
also served important ceremonial functions. Armor
could serve as a signature, as most important politi-
cal figures wore unique suits of armor specifically
designed for them. Further, armor could identify
troops or unify regiments sharing a singular style,
color, or emblem. One noted example is the signa-
ture red-lacquered armor reportedly worn by Ii
Naomasa (1561–1602), a precedent followed by his
descendants until Ii Naosuke (1815–60), whose
assassination was caused in part by his negotiation of
a trade agreement with the United States that was
opposed by conservatives. Colors favored for deco-
rating armor were usually bold hues, such as red,
deep blue, brown, black, and gold.
Even in the case of relatively humble armor,
Japanese artisans sought to make armor that was aes-
thetically pleasing as well as highly functional. Con-
sequently, armor and related objects such as sword
fittings are usually considered artistic objects in
Japan. However, in this volume, arms and armor
have been discussed as material evidence of warrior
culture. Readers are advised that stylistic and deco-
rative analysis of arms and armor have been mini-
mized in this section. Publications that explore the
artistic qualities and elements seen in warrior regalia
are identified in the Reading section and in the Gen-
eral Bibliography.
DEVELOPMENT OF BODY ARMOR
Much of what is known of early armor in Japan has
been gleaned from tomb figures dating from the
Kofun period, which often depicted military figures.
Early forms of armor from the Kofun period (ca.
300–710) were produced in styles known as keiko
and tanko. Both types are thought to have been
based on mainland prototypes.
Metal cuirasses from this era consisted of several
plated sections tightly bound together and then lac-
quered to inhibit rust. Subsequent construction
methods that were more flexible involved narrow,
roughly square, strips of bronze or iron fastened
using cords or leather. These metal parts are called
lames in English, or sane in Japanese, and remained a
central component of the relatively flexible armor
developed in Japan throughout the medieval period.
From its inception, Japanese armor was far lighter
and more flexible than the chain mail and cuirasses
made of solid metal plates used at the same time in
Europe. Japanese armorers did not confine them-
selves to metal, and instead incorporated lighter and
more malleable materials such as leather and silk (or
other fibers) along with iron or steel parts. Even
armor made during the early feudal era in Japan typi-
cally consisted of modular steel scales called lames
atop leather laced together with leather, various types
of cord, and silk. The materials used, color scheme,
and lacing format identified particular clans and indi-
viduals, and some materials, patterns, or designs were
reserved for individuals of certain status. Further,
rather than adorning the metal plates with elaborate,
etched designs that were time consuming, or simply
polishing the metal to a reflective shine, Japanese
metalworkers chose to cover the metal components
they used with lacquer.
Lacquer, a non-resinous substance similar to sap,
from the lacquer tree, was added atop the metal and
sometimes also covered the leather parts of early
medieval body armor. Lacquer (botanical name Rhus
verniciflua) is native to East Asia and has been used in
producing objects that date back more than 3,000
years. Once dried (or, technically, hardened), lacquer
W ARRIORS AND W ARFARE
169