
distribution. Yet, documentary is hardly a simple or unchanging category The “public”
looks for “real” events in
news,
“reality television” and classroom movies, while
documentarians debate more abstract truth in both form and criticism. A documentary is
also a story even if one claims a higher purpose: treating important social issues,
forgotten, exotic or famous people, or great historical moments. Yet, documentarians
manipulate all these while sharing technical and narrative frames and distribution with
other media. Documentaries also have evolved with media technologies and institutional
support.
Among the most important ancestors of American documentary are early ethnographic
filmmakers like Edward S.Curtis, recording Native Americans, and Robert Flaherty
(1884–1951), whose well-known
Nanook of the North
(1922) was complemented by
more “American” films like
Louisiana Story
(1948). Both documentarians relied on
“acted-out” sequences as they recorded “real life.” Margaret Mead and others continued
this ethnographic tradition, aimed primarily at academic markets. Documentarians could
also draw on decades of social photography including Jacob Riis, Walker Evans and
WPA photographers, as well as wartime newsreels and propaganda.
Major changes came by the 1960s with readily portable cameras and synchronized
sound recording. These gave the illusion of “real life” in action (devices now imitated in
fiction through moving cameras and jump cuts). This technology facilitated direct
cinema, which stressed unmediated observation. Here, important documentarians include
the Maysle brothers (Albert 1926–, David, 1932–87), D.A.Pennebaker (1926–) and
Richard Leacock (1921–), while major works include Leacock’s
Primary
(1960), Craig
Golbert’s
An American Family
(1972) and films by Frederick Wiseman (1930–), such as
Titticut Follies
(1967) and
High School
(1968). The intimacy and pervasiveness of the
documentary eye and the use/reading of these films evoked questions about intrusion into
private life: the Loud
family
responded angrily to their depiction on Public Television’s
n American Family
(reprised in interesting ways with the 1999
Public Broad-casting
System
(PBS) serialization of an
American Love Story
), and
Titticut Follies
was barred
from public showing for decades.
Television also changed documentary distribution and audiences. While documentaries
(especially exotic or “nature” films) had occasionally played in theaters, their distribution
more generally was limited to schools,
museums,
or other specialized settings.
Television broadcasted documentaries to a large audience via PBS, including
controversial films, such as Marlon Rigg’s
Tongues Untied
(1989), which graphically
treated gay sexuality across racial lines. Yet, in the 1990s, its independence faced
pressure from government and conservative social lobbies; Ken Burns’
Civil War
(1990)
exemplifies alternative public television documentaries with high production values,
popular audiences, commercial tie-ins and a very safe subject. Commercial and
cable
networks also offer news, news magazines, star documentaries, biography (the title of a
popular Arts & Entertainment channel series) and
MTV
shows like
Real Lives
.
Commercial documentary however, must sell to audiences and sponsors—hence it tends
to avoid controversy as well as formal complexity. Nonetheless, classic television
Encyclopedia of Contemporary American Culture 348