
and Safe Drinking Waters Act (1974) grew from this early interest. In 1978
Love Canal
(Niagara Falls, New York) refocused national attention on the detrimental effects o
hazardous waste on humans and their environment. Divergences also grew within
environmentalists: The term
“deep ecology”
was coined by Naess in 1973 to champion
self-realization and biocentric equality in contrast to the utilitarian treatment of nature by
Western society This has underpinned radical action in environmental protests as well.
A
griculture
in the US and worldwide became a focus for modern environmentalism
with soil erosion, aquifer depletions, desertification, saline incursion into irrigated soils,
climate change from land clearing, deforestation, resistance of pests to pesticides and loss
of
genetic
diversity in food crops as problems with global implications. Despite the
Green Revolution, importing high-yield agricultural techniques to developing countries to
increase food production, concerns grew about population growth and what constitutes
“sustainable development.” The notion that too many humans exist to allow coexistence
with the rest of nature continued as deep ecologists suggested population reduction and a
return to simpler ways of life. Early solutions for population control included zero
opulation growth, the notion that reproduction should be for replacement or reduction in
numbers only.
The 1980s brought more attention to the environment as implications of
acid rain
and
heat pollution were recognized worldwide. Urban heat islands, created from high
concentrations of concrete, human beings and combustion products from transportation,
were identified as major contributors to build-ups of pollutants, especially particulates,
around American
cities
and
suburbs
. Issues of urban pollution mobilized the
Environmental Justice
Movement to emerge from the shadows of mainstream
environmentalism. It focused on racism and exposure to environmental hazards, noting
the general lack of attention by mainstream, predominantly white, environmental
organizations to problems concerning people of color. Out of this split grew the People o
Color Environmental Leadership Summit in 1991 and many
neighborhood
projects,
from
Los Angeles, CA
to the
Northeast
.
The 1980s and 1990s saw a strong
backlash
against environmentalism with
environmental burdens placed on businesses and governments over-whelming available
resources. The so-called “unholy trinity” of risk assessment, unfunded mandates and
roperty rights emerged through the 1990s to threaten progress in environmental
legislation. When the Exxon Valdez ran aground and dumped its oily cargo into one o
the most pristine marine areas of the United States, there was a flurry of environmental
activity from cleaning wildlife and shorelines to changing regulations for shipping such
substances (see
oil spills)
. However, as pictures of oil-soaked birds and marine mammals
yielded to reports of cleanup fraud and environmental infighting, the even
’s impact
evaporated. During the early 1990s, many environmental organizations showed dramatic
decreases in membership and financial support, perhaps as legislation intruded further
into the lifestyles of the
middle class
. However, during this same time period there was
an increased interest in ideas of
ecofeminism
(a term coined by Francoise D’Eaubonne in
1974) as a part of the environmentalist movement, connecting the domination of women
Entries A-Z 387