3.4 Morphological and Kinetic Behavior of Monocrystals 127
Y, because the surface having a new composition undergoes a direct growth caused
by supercooling. The total state of the solution does not vary during this process,
while monitoring the crystal composition in situ is impossible.
It is important that the value of meta-equilibrium supercooling depends only
upon a proportion of isomorphic components in solution and the crystal composi-
tion. No temperature dependence of meta-equilibrium supercooling upon absolute
concentrations of the components in the solution was observed. So, it can be seen
that data obtained for (Co,Ni)(NH
4
)
2
(SO
4
)
2
⋅6H
2
O–H
2
O system at different satura-
tion temperatures ranging from 26°C to 30.5°C form homotypic dependences (Fig.
3.15a). It is to be noted that the test measurements of meta-equilibrium supercool-
ings for Co- and Ni-seeds in solutions with 50:50 (%wt) ratio of isomorphic com-
ponents at saturation temperatures of 26 and 28.4°C (points 3 and 7) agreed within
0.1°C (ΔT = 1.7°C).
In a similar way it can be supposed that the system is in a metastable overheated
state comprising a short interruption of growth phase induced by a salting-out effect
of the protocrystal. Actually, this state has not been detected, but if it existed, it could
not be considered as a symmetrical process to one discussed above. Overheating can
inhibit only the second stage of salting-out, i.e., growth, termination of which would
not affect dissolution, but not the initial stage, i.e., dissolution that limits the entire
process, including the growth stage. No crystals of any composition can resist
dissolution in an overheated system, since undersaturation conditions have no
analogy to the metastable supersaturated state.
Scheme of the process proceeding under kinetic conditions in the systems, similar
to (Co,Ni)(NH
4
)
2
(SO
4
)
2
.6H
2
O–H
2
O, was discussed in Sects. 3.3.2 and 3.3.3. It allows
concluding that increased difference between the crystal and solution compositions
results in acceleration of isothermal replacement and raising the degree of meta-
equilibrium supercooling and prolongation of the pre-growth period. So, kinetic–
morphological nonmonotony of changes in the solution composition observed in
the course of volume-deficient replacement as acceleration of the replacement rate
of in solutions of intermediate composition (Figs. 3.12b, e) and as peaks of curves in
Figs. 3.14c–f was totally unexpected.
Nature of the revealed nonmonotony is unclear, but most probably it results from
the difference in diffusion processes occurring in the crystal neighborhoods during
interaction with solution of different compositions. Indeed, the rate of salting-out is
directly proportional to the rate of delivering the solution particles to the crystal.
Dissolution accelerates with increasing the difference between the crystal and solu-
tion compositions, but if the difference is relatively small, dissolution is not too
intense and it limits the entire reaction. As the compositional differences and dis-
solution rate increase, diffusion from the solution becomes the limiting stage, since
the diffusion layer becomes saturated with the crystal components and the salting-
out flows reach the state of equilibrium. Then, as saturation increases, inflow of the
solution particles becomes blocked and thus the entire reaction is inhibited.
It is interesting to point out that effect of the solution composition upon charac-
teristics of the process with both volume-deficit and volume-excess is quite similar
in nature and in absolute values (Fig. 3.14). According to the proposed explanation