
Another type of paleomagnetic sample is collected by the simpler
method of orienting a block of the outcrop that is later broken and
labeled. These types of samples are commonly collected when the
lithology is not suitable for coring. There are logistic complications
for transporting the coring equipment (including water and gasoline)
to the outcrop, there are laws forbidding the use of coring equipment
(as for example in some national parks or reserve areas), or in despera-
tion when the coring equipment breaks down in the middle of a field
season. Although simpler in logistics, this method of sample collection
is not as good as the coring method because of the limitations in the
accuracy of orientation and on the need of collecting joint blocks that
are more likely to have been affected by weathering than the massive
portions of the outcrop. It also requires carrying of an excess material
that has to be thrown away after specimens have been sliced out of the
sample in the laboratory.
The third main type of paleomagnetic sample is collected in the
form of core sample obtained from lake- or sea-bottom cores or from
exploration wells. These samples are typically 10 cm diameter and
can be from a few meters to some hundreds of meters and even kilo-
meters long. There are two main types of coring techniques in this
category: piston coring (in which the bit is introduced forcefully into
the sediment) and rotary drills (similar in all respects to the first type
of samples discussed above, but with drills that are much larger and
not likely to be handled by just one bare-handed operator). Both types
of cores are commonly azimuthally unoriented and the direction of the
core is assumed to be vertical. Evidently, these types of samples pro-
vide less reliability in terms of accuracy of orientation, which often
involve the operation of expensive machinery and may not yield
recovery of the entire core, but as already mentioned they can be the
only access to one particular rock unit.
In some particular situations, paleomagnetic samples can be col-
lected by using very specific (and sometimes very ingenious) methods
that often combine some aspects of the three main types just men-
tioned. For example, loose sediments that are accessible in outcrop
cannot be suitable for drilling or for block sampling. In this case, sam-
ples can be collected by inserting small plastic boxes in the sediment
and orienting them before removing the material around to retrieve
the box. Some degrees of impregnation with an epoxic resin might
also be used for this purpose, or any other method that allows the
operator to retrieve a reasonably well oriented sample.
In summary, the most important aspect to have in mind when col-
lecting samples for any paleomagnetic work is the ability to orient
the samples. Although in some circumstances the orientation must be
necessarily limited to a distinction between the up and down direc-
tions, therefore limiting the utility of such samples.
Edgardo Cañón-Tapia
Cross-references
Paleomagnetism
PALEOMAGNETIC SECULAR VARIATION
The source of the Earth’s magnetic field has been the subject of scien-
tific study for more than 400 years (e.g., Gilbert, 1600). At present we
believe that most of the field measured at the Earth’s surface is of internal
origin, generated by hydromagnetic dynamo action in the liquid-iron
outer core. Historic measurements of the geomagnetic field have docu-
mented its primarily dipolar spatial structure at the Earth’s surface
and its temporal variability, which is termed as secular variation. One
notable characteristic of the Earth’s magnetic field and secular variation
is its full vector nature, with significant space-time variability in
both directions and intensity. Recent historic secular variation (HSV)
studies (e.g., Thompson and Barraclough, 1982; Bloxham and Gubbins,
1985. Olson et al., 2002) have characterized the global pattern of
short-term secular variation and have related its variability to the core
dynamo process.
Paleomagnetic studies make it clear, however, that the Earth’s mag-
netic field has undergone a wider range of temporal and spatial varia-
bility than has been seen in historic times. Geomagnetic field polarity
reversals have occurred intermittently in time (e.g., Cande and Kent,
1995) and the intervening time intervals of stable dipole polarity con-
tain paleomagnetic secular variation (PSV) larger in amplitude and
broader in frequency content than HSV. PSV studies have also docu-
mented occasional excursions (Watkins, 1976; Verosub and Banerjee,
1977), which are anomalous PSV fluctuations that may be aborted
polarity reversals or represent a fundamentally different multipolar
state of the geomagnetic field (Lund et al., 1998, 2001).
PSV is estimated from the paleomagnetic study of archeological
materials, unconsolidated sediments, and rocks. The paleomagnetic
methods used to recover PSV data are well documented (e.g., Butler,
1992. Tauxe, 1993. Merrill et al., 1998; Dunlop and Özdemir, 2001),
and everyone noticed that rather different methods are normally used
to recover estimates of paleomagnetic field direction and intensity.
Therefore, historically, PSV directional data usually do not have asso-
ciated paleointensity estimates and vice versa. However, over the last
decade that tendency has finally been balanced by the development
of numerous high-resolution full-vector PSV records.
This article surveys our current knowledge of PSV; it will provide
an overview of PSV data sources, methods of PSV analysis, long-term
characteristics of PSV, and models for PSV behavior. The survey will
discuss both intensity and directional variability. Special attention
will be paid to the relationship between PSV and HSV, the evidence
for or against long-term stationarity of PSV, the relationship of PSV
to excursions, and the characteristics of PSV that may be useful in
dynamo studies.
PSV data
PSV data come from a wide variety of paleomagnetic studies that can
be separated into three groups based on the type of sediment or rock
measured, the degree of detail in stratigraphic sampling, and the
degree of age control for each study. The three resulting PSV data
groups are (1) studies of Quaternary-aged sequences of unconsolidated
sediments, lava flows, or archeological materials, which can be dated in
detail by radiocarbon methods or oxygen isotope stratigraphy, and
which are sampled in detail sufficient to resolve the temporal pattern
of PSV variability (termed waveform information); (2) studies of older
sediment or lava flow sequences that have waveform information but
no detailed age control; and (3) studies of any aged rock or sediment
sequences that have poor within sequence age control and no wave-
form information (sequential data are not serially correlated). The first
type of PSV study can be used for a full spectrum of time series ana-
lyses (waveform, spectral, or statistical analyses); the second type of
study can be used for waveform and statistical analyses; the third type
of study is only suitable for statistical analysis.
The materials normally used for detailed paleomagnetic studies of
PSV are archeological materials (kilns, fire pits, etc.), lava flows, and
lake or marine sediment sequences. Each of these materials has inherent
advantages and disadvantages for the accurate recording of PSVand the
accumulation of paleomagnetic records from all three materials in par-
allel is the ideal way to establish regional patterns of PSV. Figure P9
illustrates the use of multiple PSV records derived from multiple
766 PALEOMAGNETIC SECULAR VARIATION