302 Nitrogen in the Environment
habitat or nursery for larvae, juveniles, or adult fish and shellfish. As an example,
Heck et al. (1995) suggests that eelgrass habitat can support macroinvertebrate pro-
duction (prey items for fish) that is disproportionately large compared with unveg-
etated areas (intertidal and subtidal muds). SAV can dominate overall secondary
productivity of shallow estuaries even when its areal coverage is as low as 10%,
and its contribution to the consumer food web can be more significant than implied
by its level of contribution to primary production. Simply put, concern for SAV
decline or loss focuses on the loss of all the stated functions above, especially for
the food web (fish and shellfish) supported by its presence.
The evidence for SAV response to nutrients goes beyond epidemiological and
anecdotal site trends, and there are a number of detailed examples of global SAV
decline in the last half-century, in Europe, North America, and Australia (e.g.,
Orth and Moore, 1983 ; Costa, 1988 ; Valiela et al., 1992 ; Dennison et al., 1993 ;
Fourqurean and Robblee, 1999 ). Throughout history there have been other causes
of seagrass declines, but many during the last half of the 20th century have been
linked to nutrients, specifically N. A variety of controlled experiments, including
in mesocosms, have confirmed a link to N and the qualitative sequence of events
with increasing loading (cf. Kemp et al., 1983 ; Twilley et al., 1985 ; Short et al.,
1995 ; Taylor et al., 1995a, b ). Based on various site trends, comparative analyses,
and experimental evidence, Duarte (1995) determined that there was “ an adequate
empirical basis to formulate qualitative predictions on the direction of change in
submerged vegetation upon nutrient enrichment, ” but there was a lesser basis to pre-
dict recovery with lessening of nutrient loading.
It has been noted that changes in SAV are not gradual, but have thresholds and
appear as step changes with a sudden shift in vegetation, implying both direct and
indirect effects are at play. A principal mechanism for nutrient effects on SAV is
uniformly recognized as a secondary consequence of enrichment of other primary
producers. Hansson (1988) confirmed that under very low nutrient conditions in
lakes, benthic algae can access nutrients from sediments and have a competitive
advantage over planktonic algae, whose advantage grows with nutrients in the water
column, due to their superior access to light. Similar concepts apply where principal
benthic producers are rooted macrophytes or seagrasses ( Figure 9a ). Direct nutrient
stimulation of plankton; periphyton on sediments; epiphytes on the vegetation, or
other algal, emergent; or floating overgrowth all can induce light limitation of the
seagrass or macrophyte, rooted to the bottom and thus subject to shading by unat-
tached forms. Studies also suggest that algal stimulation can affect root metabolism
and indirectly affect SAV, and there is some variability in the paradigm that may
be induced by the effects of grazers on different producer forms. But the simple
progression of Figure 9a , long described as a freshwater eutrophication paradigm
( Wetzel, 1983 ), appears applicable to estuarine areas ( Stevenson, 1988 ; Sand-Jensen
and Borum, 1991 ) and has been a principal conceptual foundation of studies exam-
ining SAV decline.
CH10-P374347.indd 302CH10-P374347.indd 302 5/31/2008 6:07:24 PM5/31/2008 6:07:24 PM